We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Philip Czech, University of Salzburg,Lisa Heschl, University of Graz,Karin Lukas, Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Menschenrechte, Austria,Manfred Nowak, University of Vienna,Gerd Oberleitner, European Training and Research Centre for Human Rights and Democracy, University of Graz
The outbreak of COVID-19 in Europe has significantly affected European Union (EU, the Union) policy-making in a wealth of policy areas, partly altering the perception of policy priorities and the role of the EU in the scenario depicted by the crisis. This contribution aims to grasp the salience of COVID-19's effects in the context of the EU commitment to developing tools and procedures to address the ongoing rule of law crisis in some Member States and prevent future violations. Based on a content analysis of a wealth of public documents adopted by EU institutions from the beginning of the crisis, this contribution argues that the spread of COVID-19, namely, the unprecedented way in which the crisis has exposed the fragility of all EU values, has produced two specific consequences on the overall EU effort to uphold the rule of law (RoL). The first was urging all EU institutions and the majority of Member States to eventually converge to deliver without delay or obstructionism on pledged measures. The second was the beginning of a shiftin the Commission's overall strategy to enhance European resilience vis-à-vis this crisis: from the primacy of the RoL as an ‘umbrella principle’ related to, but eventually subsuming other key EU values, to a more balanced, cooperative and comprehensive approach, where diverse monitoring and protection initiatives on the RoL, democracy and fundamental rights mutually complement each other. Despite these changes, however, the Commission's approach remains significantly distinct and distant from that proposed by the European Parliament (EP), weakening the potential of the newly adopted tools.
INTRODUCTION
The outbreak of COVID-19 in Europe has significantly affected the European Union (EU, the Union) policy-making in a wealth of policy areas (from the environment to health, from digitalisation to external action), partly altering the perception of policy priorities and the role of the EU in the scenario depicted by the crisis. The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic have also regarded the overall EU commitment to developing more effective tools and procedures to face the rule of law (RoL) crisis in some EU Member States (MS) and prevent future violations.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.