We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
In 1977, a four-course rotation was set up at Ropsley (UK) to study crop response to eight rates of nitrogen application (35–265 kg ha−1). This rotation continued until 1990 when continuous winter wheat was introduced. Results from 1978 to 1990 provide an opportunity to study the initial phase of cumulative effects from different rates of N fertilizer application on the recovery of N by cereals and the retention of N in the soil.
From 1978 to 1990, considerable variation in the recovery of nitrogen by winter wheat was observed. Neither rainfall nor drainage, as indicators of possible denitrification or leaching losses, provided a useful explanation for this, possibly because of the relatively dry conditions prevailing after spring fertilizer application. There was no evidence of increased soil N fertility, beyond single year residues, as a result of large N applications over the 13-year period.
In order to achieve the economic optimum grain yield, it was necessary to use N applications which produced inefficient recovery of N. Thus, greater return of N in crop residues and immobilization at relatively large N applications (>150 kg ha−1) contributed to an observed build-up in soil organic N over the period of study. Plots receiving, on average, 265 kg ha−1 appeared to gain c. 250 kg ha−1 N over control plots (35 kg ha−1) after 13 years of N application. Reducing the N application rate from the economic optimum to a more biologically efficient N rate (156 kg ha−1) was calculated to result in an average yield loss of 0·305 t ha−1 and cause an estimated £17 ha−1 loss in profit.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.