We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Horizon scanning provides timely intelligence about innovative health technologies in clinical development by commercial and non-commercial organizations. The horizon scanning for obesity medicines, carried out by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory (IO), aimed to identify emerging obesity medicines to inform decision-making by national stakeholders and to shape future research.
Methods
In July 2023, the IO utilized horizon scanning methodology to identify medicines for preventing and treating obesity either primarily or as a comorbidity. The scans included medicines in preclinical and clinical development (phase I, I/II, II, II/III, III, or IV) sponsored by industry and non-industry for all population groups. Trial locations included Australia, Canada, the European Union, the UK, and the USA. Data were collected from the IO’s internal database (the Medicines Innovation Database), ClinicalTrials.gov, the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the Citeline Pharmaprojects database. The data were systematically screened and analyzed.
Results
A total of 405 clinical trials were identified that evaluated 177 unique medicinal interventions. Among these, 47 unique preclinical interventions were identified from preclinical studies. A total of 256 (63%) trials were sponsored by industry, 139 (34%) by non-industry, and 10 (3%) by industry and non-industry jointly. The top five drug classes included anorectic or anti-obesity medicines (n=75; 42%), antihyperglycemics (n=24; 14%), anti-inflammatories (n=8; 5%), hepatoprotectants (n=7; 4%), and antihyperlipidemics (n=4; 2%). At the time of scanning, 48 (27%) medicines were unlicensed in the UK and 129 (73%) were not. Among the licensed medicines, 37 (77%) were off patent and 11 (23%) were on patent.
Conclusions
The IO’s horizon scanning process can identify and deliver timely intelligence to support decision-making and facilitate adoption of new medicines to target areas of unmet clinical need. The obesity medicines scan identified medicinal interventions in preclinical and clinical development and provides valuable insights into the trends and research gaps in preventing and treating obesity.
It is vital that horizon scanning organizations can capture and disseminate intelligence on new and repurposed medicines in clinical development. To our knowledge, there are no standardized classification systems to capture this intelligence. This study aims to create a novel classification system to allow new and repurposed medicines horizon scanning intelligence to be disseminated to healthcare organizations.
Methods
A multidisciplinary working group undertook literature searching and an iterative, three-stage piloting process to build consensus on a classification system. Supplementary data collection was carried out to facilitate the implementation and validation of the system on the National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory (IO)‘s horizon scanning database, the Medicines Innovation Database (MInD).
Results
Our piloting process highlighted important issues such as the patency and regulatory approval status of individual medicines and how combination therapies interact with these characteristics. We created a classification system with six values (New Technology, Repurposed Technology (Off-patent/Generic), Repurposed Technology (On-patent/Branded), Repurposed Technology (Never commercialised), New + Repurposed Technology (Combinations-only), Repurposed Technology (Combinations-only)) that account for these characteristics to provide novel horizon scanning insights. We validated our system through application to over 20,000 technology records on the MInD.
Conclusions
Our system provides the opportunity to deliver concise yet informative intelligence to healthcare organizations and those studying the clinical development landscape of medicines. Inbuilt flexibility and the use of publicly available data sources ensure that it can be utilized by all, regardless of location or resource availability.
The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory (IO) national horizon scanning research centre, has a remit to notify its stakeholders, including the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), about innovative interventions; including biosimilar medicines in the pipeline. Biosimilar medicines bypass many developmental steps, making them substantially cheaper to manufacture for providers, which increases market availability and improves treatment access for patients.
Methods
Since 2017, the NIHR IO has monitored biosimilars in clinical development that align to the NICE health technology assessment remit. The data set explored was exported from our internal medicines innovation database - MInD.
Data sets were created that included information on the characteristics of biosimilars and their associated clinical trials. Analyses and visualization creation were carried out using Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Power BI.
Results
A total of 100 unique biosimilar medicines in 136 clinical trials were included in the MInD since April 2017. Of these, 44 percent of biosimilars are currently EMA-approved (Nov 2021). Adalimumab was the reference medicine with the most unique biosimilars identified (12%). Seventy-two percent of the biosimilars in MInD were indicated for non-oncology conditions, twenty percent for oncology condition and eight percent for both.
There were 46 biosimilars unapproved, which were in active development. Of these biosimilars 17.4 percent are indicated for an oncology condition, 78.3 percent for non-oncology conditions, and 4.3 percent for biosimilars for both. Aflibercept was the reference product with the most (eight) biosimilars in active development.
There were 56 individual clinical trials in the MInD that list a biosimilar in development. For 26 trials, the primary completion date (PCD) was prior to 2021, whilst 28 trials listed a PCD post-2021, and 2 PCD’s were unavailable
Conclusions
Our analysis identified high levels of active clinical development for biosimilars. The majority of biosimilars being developed are indicated for non-oncology conditions, with many in trials due to readout in the near future. Early identification, monitoring and reporting of biosimilars allows for expedited patient access and benefits, including cost-savings for health services.
This study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [(HSRIC-2016-10009)/Innovation Observatory].
While various criteria exist to define or categorize innovative medicines as new or repurposed, to our knowledge there are no standardized systems that sufficiently capture the range of pipeline products. The National Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory (NIHR IO) undertakes routine horizon scanning to support health technology assessment (HTA) in England and maintains a comprehensive Medicines Innovation Database (MInD). The aim of this project is to develop a ‘technology type’ (new versus repurposed) classification system for application within the MInD and to provide a high-level analysis of the emergent data.
Methods
We reviewed gray literature, regulatory websites, and drug repositories to identify existing ‘technology type’ classification criteria. Preliminary definitions and classifications for use on the MInD were discussed, refined, and agreed by consensus. Innovative medicines on the MInD were classified as either new or repurposed based on their regulatory approval status (Marketing Authorization) using data from the electronic medicines compendium. For repurposed medicines, further classification was undertaken using abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) data from the FDA Orange Book to identify generic medicines (patency and exclusivity status). We combined a range of semi-automated and manually derived data during this process.
Results
Six technology types were identified and applied to the MInD: (i) new technology; (ii) repurposed technology (on-patent/branded); (iii) repurposed drug (off-patent/generic); (iv) repurposed technology (never commercialized); (v) new and repurposed technology (combinations); and (vi) repurposed technology (combinations). Preliminary analysis of a subset of MInD records identified in July 2021 (n = 113) found mainly 52 percent new technologies, 27 percent new and repurposed technologies (combinations) and 14 percent repurposed technology (never commercialized). Further analysis of approximately 7000 MInD records are ongoing and will report temporal trends, regulatory status, and key challenges.
Conclusions
Our novel evidence-based approach to developing classifications for technology types of innovative medicines resulted in six mutually exclusive states that can be applied to a larger dataset. We believe this offers HTA stakeholders a mechanism to gain valuable insights into the innovation trends, gaps, and areas of unmet need.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.