We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
Introduction: Scenes of Switzerland
In Switzerland, women were not enfranchised on the federal level until 1971. Of twenty-six cantons, the last to allow women to vote in cantonal elections was Appenzell-Innerrhoden in 1990. This reform was not made through legislative processes, but only after female citizens complained to the Swiss Federal Supreme Court.
Despite late enfranchisement, citizens in Swiss cantons actively campaigned for delegate quotas, particularly during the 1990s. Although ultimately unsuccessful, campaigns aimed at delegate quotas for women for federal political offices and in two cantons, Solothurn and Uri. In the Swiss system of direct democracy, cantonal initiatives are scrutinized for their compatibility with the federal constitution before they are submitted to the people for a popular vote. Regarding the two cantonal quota initiatives, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court issued decisions in 1996 and 1998. In its first decision, the Federal Supreme Court considered a far-reaching proposal to reserve 50 percent of the seats of all elected offices in the legislative, executive, and judicial branches in Solothurn for women. The proposal requested that all open positions be earmarked for the underrepresented sex until men and women were represented “according to their proportion in the canton's population.” The Court found this bill manifestly unconstitutional due to its “obvious disproportionality” in curtailing active and passive voting rights.
In its second judgment, the Federal Supreme Court partly upheld a more moderate initiative in Uri.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.