We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Although health care is generally designed to help people, it has the potential to effectively impede recovery for people using substances by obvious and subtle discrimination. Stigmatizing attitudes among health professionals are common, regularly expected by people who use substances and potentially reduce quality of delivered clinical care. The power gradient that drives stigma and discriminatory behavior is particularly palpable in the healthcare setting and prevalent within different clinical situations like emergency medicine, primary care, and the psychiatric ward as within language. Comprising the current evidence of interventions, specific clinical settings and language regarding substance use stigma, we suggest recommendations for changes in clinical practice. Professionals need to avoid inflicting very real harm by increasing shame and reducing self-worth through stigmatizing settings, language, and concepts. Reducing substance use stigma is an integral and profoundly important part of caring for people who use substances and should be considered as such.
Promulgating a continuum model of mental health and mental illness has been proposed as a way to reduce stigma by decreasing notions of differentness. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines whether continuum beliefs are associated with lower stigma, and whether continuum interventions reduce stigma.
Methods
Following a pre-defined protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42019123606), we searched three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO) yielding 6726 studies. After screening, we included 33 studies covering continuum beliefs, mental illness, and stigma. Of these, 13 studies were included in meta-analysis.
Results
Continuum beliefs are consistently associated with lower stigma. Interventions were effective at manipulating continuum beliefs but differ in their effects on stigmatising attitudes.
Conclusions
We discuss whether and to what extent attitudes towards people with mental illness can be improved by providing information on a mental health-mental illness continuum. It appeared to be relevant whether interventions promoted a feeling of ‘us’ and a process of identification with the person with mental illness. We discuss implications for the design of future interventions.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.