We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Evaluate impact of COVID-19 prevention training with video-based feedback on nursing home (NH) staff safety behaviors.
Design:
Public health intervention
Setting & Participants:
Twelve NHs in Orange County, California, 6/2020-4/2022
Methods:
NHs received direct-to-staff COVID-19 prevention training and weekly feedback reports with video montages about hand hygiene, mask-wearing, and mask/face-touching. One-hour periods of recorded streaming video from common areas (breakroom, hallway, nursing station, entryway) were sampled randomly across days of the week and nursing shifts for safe behavior. Multivariable models assessed the intervention impact.
Results:
Video auditing encompassed 182,803 staff opportunities for safe behavior. Hand hygiene errors improved from first (67.0%) to last (35.7%) months of the intervention, decreasing 7.6% per month (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.92–0.93, P < 0.001); masking errors improved from first (10.3 %) to last (6.6%) months of the intervention, decreasing 2.3% per month (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97–0.99, P < 0.001); face/mask touching improved from first (30.0%) to last (10.6%) months of the intervention, decreasing 2.5% per month (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97–0.98, P < 0.001). Hand hygiene errors were most common in entryways and on weekends, with similar rates across shifts. Masking errors and face/mask touching errors were most common in breakrooms, with the latter occurring most commonly during the day (7A.M.–3P.M.) shift, with similar rates across weekdays/weekends. Error reductions were seen across camera locations, days of the week, and nursing shifts, suggesting a widespread benefit within participating NHs.
Conclusion:
Direct-to-staff training with video-based feedback was temporally associated with improved hand hygiene, masking, and face/mask-touching behaviors among NH staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.