We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Hand hygiene is effective to prevent transmission of pathogens and healthcare-associated infections. Despite efforts by hospitals to improve hand hygiene adherence among healthcare practitioners (HCP), adherence in neonatology wards is often limited.
Objective:
Identifying determinants, i.e., facilitators and barriers, to hand hygiene adherence among frontline HCP in neonatology.
Design:
Qualitative implementation research study.
Setting:
Department of Neonatology of the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
Methods:
Semi-structured interviews with frontline HCP and Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) experts were conducted in November 2022. Interviews were coded deductively according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behavior model (COM-B), and inductively to capture nuances in the data. Determinants whose addressing was perceived to likely improve hand hygiene adherence in the current setting were rated as “high priority”.
Results:
A total of 42 interviews were conducted, 27 (64%) with nurses, six (14%) with physicians, four (10%) with other professions, and five (12%) with IPC experts. Sixteen determinants were identified, twelve of which were high-priority, four in each COM-B domain. Knowledge, attention control, planning workflows, and habits & automatisms were found in “Capability,” workload & emergencies, invisibility of germs, role models, and being observed in “Opportunity,” and bad conscience, experience consequences of (non-) adherence, self-reflection, and intention to adhere to hand hygiene in “Motivation.”
Discussion/Conclusion:
Facilitators from all COM-B domains and barriers from “Capability” and “Opportunity” influence hand hygiene behavior in neonatology settings. Our findings can now inform interventions to improving hand hygiene adherence in neonatal settings.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.