Search

Summary

This poses the question as to why the American air arm began World War II with excellent offensive bombers but mediocre defense fighter planes, which was seemingly in contradiction to a national policy of isolationism and defense. The standard explanation for this dichotomy is that doctrine shaped force structure. I disagree and believe it was a combination of technology, economics, the Army procurement system, and personalities that played the determinant role.

Until the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour, America did not want war, with the 1930s marked by strong isolationism and an emphasis on defense. However, in December 1941, it wasn't defensive aircraft the Army Air Corps had been steadily procuring, but offensive long-range heavy bombers, whilst US pursuit planes were decidedly inferior to their European counterparts. In this new history of the development of American air power, Phillip Meilinger dispels the notion that young air zealots pushed for a bomber-heavy force, revealing instead the technological, economic and bureaucratic forces which shaped the air force. He examines the role of scientists and engineers, developments in commercial aviation, and conflicting priorities of the Army and Air Corps, as well as how these were in turn influenced by America's political leaders. Building an Air Force is essential for understanding a conflict in which whoever controlled the skies controlled the land and seas beneath.

Search Results

Refine search

Refine search

Actions for selected content:

2 results

Introduction

Summary

Building an Air Force

Search Results

Refine search

Refine search

Actions for selected content:

Save Search

2 results

Introduction

Summary

Building an Air Force