The peer review process is fundamental to academic publishing, guaranteeing the integrity and quality of the research upon which we depend. However, it is also infamous for its sluggishness—occasionally excruciatingly so. For numerous authors, the prolonged wait for feedback on their articles might seem interminable, particularly when they are enthusiastic about disseminating innovative discoveries to the public. But why exactly does peer review take so long? The reasons are complex and multifaceted, involving challenges faced by editors, reviewers, and authors alike. By understanding these challenges, we can start to see the bigger picture and work towards solutions that might speed things up.
“Patience requires knowing not just the cost of delay, but also the benefit of delay”
“The two most powerful warriors are patience and time.”-Leo Tolstoy
“Lost time is never found again.” - Benjamin Franklin
