To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Negative symptoms are a core feature of psychosis and a strong predictor of functional outcome, yet they remain difficult to assess due to conceptual and methodological challenges. Although abnormalities in emotional expressivity and emotional reactivity are documented in individuals at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis, these domains are typically examined independently, and their relationship remains unclear.
Methods
Facial expressions were quantified using automated facial analysis (FaceReader) during clinical interviews in 101 CHR individuals and 41 healthy controls (HCs). Emotional reactivity was assessed using the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). Principal component analyses were conducted on facial expression and emotional reactivity variables within the CHR group. Associations with negative symptom domains, positive symptoms, and social functioning were examined using correlational and two-step regression analyses.
Results
CHR participants showed greater disgust expression than HCs (g = 0.40, uncorrected p = .0025, FDR-corrected p = .023). Facial expression and emotional reactivity components showed minimal associations (p > .20). Reduced high-arousal facial expressions were associated with greater emotional expressivity deficits (r = −.22, p = .027), whereas greater happy facial expression was associated with more motivation and pleasure impairment (r = .21, p = .044). Happy facial expression explained additional variance in motivation symptoms beyond emotional reactivity (ΔR2 = .089, p = .008).
Conclusions
Automated facial expression captured variance in some negative symptom domains that was largely independent of emotional reactivity. These findings support the use of multimodal, objective assessments to improve characterization of negative symptoms in psychosis risk.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.