We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A numerical simulation of a two-dimensional rectangular supersonic intake has been performed in a steady-state condition to understand the effect of separation bubble size and its position on the intake performance. Diverse characteristics of separation bubbles in terms of their position, size and quantity have been systematically investigated under varying cowl deflections ranging between $\alpha $ = 0${{\rm{\;}}^ \circ }$ and 4${{\rm{\;}}^ \circ }$ within the intake system. The study encompasses a range of Mach numbers, specifically between M = 1.5 and 3, allowing for comprehensive comparisons of pressure recovery and flow distortions associated with each configuration. The flow field is generated using compressible Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations along with k-$\omega $ turbulence model. The numerical model is validated using previous experimental and numerical results. Intake unstart is observed when a large separation bubble forms on the ramp surface. The separation bubble shifts from the ramp and moves towards the exit as the Mach number and cowl angle change, resulting in the intake restart. The performance of the intake is observed to be degrading as separation size increases with changes in Mach number and cowl angles. At fixed Mach number, pressure recovery of the intake is observed to be improving with increase in cowl deflection owing to the reduction in net separation bubble size. Maximum TPR of 0.772 is observed at M = 2.2 with 4${{\rm{\;}}^ \circ }$ cowl deflection characterised by net separation of 1.65 mm. Flow distortion is found to be dependent on separation size, position and number of separation bubbles.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.