To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Plagiarism is not illegal, but copyright infringement is, and laws concerning copyright have evolved to favor the rights of content creators at the expense of those who might wish to make use of or transform this work. The use of copyrighted material is allowed under limited circumstances known as fair use. These include exceptions for parody and using work for educational purposes. However, there are gray areas, and this chapter describes a couple of these. One is fan fiction, in which writers make use of the characters and worlds created by published authors. Some authors encourage this, while others deplore it. Another is cookbooks, since lists of ingredients or procedures can’t be copyrighted. The chapter also includes three domains in which plagiarism seems to be rampant. One is the content of commencement addresses. Many speakers at graduation ceremonies have used the speeches of others, incorrectly believing they were free for the taking. Another is music that employs short samples from earlier, copyrighted songs. And contests that require the creation of new music for competitions – such as the annual Eurovision contest – seem tailor-made for plagiarism to occur.
Drumming is often pigeonholed as solely a visceral experience. Although it is almost impossible to hide this visceral nature, it undoubtedly has cognitive components, which supports the idea of music as an embodied activity. In this essay, I analyse John Bonham’s performance on Led Zeppelin’s ‘When the Levee Breaks’ (1971) to demonstrate how cognitive scientist Mark Johnson’s five dimensions of the human body (biological, ecological, phenomenological, social, and cultural) can reveal meaning in drumming. By applying all five levels to the song one at a time, I peel back layers of meaning. In Johnson’s final level, I propose what I term a Tonic Beat Pattern Theory based on tension and release that serves as a method of drum analysis across rock music to explain how drummers contribute to affect and meaning. In any band, the drummer is the main driver of rhythm and groove. Drummers create musical trajectories in songs that not only make fans wiggle our hips, move our feet, and bang our heads, but also, create just about any affect the song calls for. This essay begins to uncover why rock drumming matters.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.