To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This study aimed to translate the Family Appraisal of Caregiving Questionnaire for Palliative Care (FACQ-PC) into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties.
Methods
After completing the necessary translation stages, 190 participants (109 women and 81 men) with a mean age of 43.63 years (SD = 11.83), who provided care to individuals requiring palliative care, were recruited using convenience sampling. Participants completed the Sociodemographic Information Form, FACQ-PC, Burden Interview, Positive and Negative Affect Scale, and Palliative Performance Scale. Subsequently, reliability and validity analyses were conducted on the collected data.
Results
Reliability analyses included internal consistency coefficients and test–retest reliability. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were 0.88 for the negative outcome’s subscale, 0.90 for the positive caregiving appraisal subscale, and 0.82 for the family well-being subscale. Pearson’s correlation coefficients for test–retest reliability were 0.95, 0.87, and 0.94 for the negative outcomes, positive caregiving appraisal, and family well-being subscales, respectively. Validity analyses revealed a 3-factor structure similar to that of the Polish version but different from that of the original version. Based on factor loadings, two items were removed from the scale, resulting in a final 23-item version. Examination of the factor loadings revealed that these 2 items did not load onto any factor.
Significance of results
The reliability and validity analyses indicated that the Turkish version is a reliable and valid measurement tool for research and clinical applications. This tool is recommended for addressing the challenges faced by primary care physicians, health-care professionals working in home health and palliative care units, as well as family members and relatives who provide palliative care to patients.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.