We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The incursions of external competitors provides a further essential element in the definition of sovereign space. How the state’s boundaries were regarded spatially shifted in relation to the modes of their contestation: Perceptions of a state’s boundaries and territorializations were distinct depending on the apprehended cultural, and thus spatial, commensurability of the competitor, a distinction that is rendered visible in the noticeable shift in attention toward non-peer neighbors from the Warring States period to the Han dynasty. The spatial disposition (xing) of peer entities was distinguishable by a comparably ritualized adminstrative state structure. This influenced both the “paring off” of territory (xuedi) and on diplomatic treatment. The early Chinese state disparaged areas outside of its spatio-cultural purview as the “wilds,” but, in keeping with the zonal conception of space, the distinction between internal and external was gradual. The possibility of a ritualized fraternity impacted the character of a rivalry, and the spatial commensurability of rival polities. Because borders were fungible, crossing them was not itself a transgression; sovereignty was not equatable with a military line. Invasion (qin) was the penetration of a ritually sanctified space without permission.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.