In this response to the target article by Law, Power, and Quinto-Pozos, I draw attention to the fact that ‘sound change’ in sign languages does not seem to follow the Neogrammarian regularity principle and that, as a consequence, synchronic phonologies of sign languages do not have productive, obligatory phonological rules (whether allophonic or allomorphic rules). For example, the sound change that introduced aspiration for voiceless stops at the beginning of stressed syllables (when not preceded by /s/) is reflected as a regular, so-called allophonic rule in the synchronic phonological grammar of Modern English. Sign languages do not appear to have such regular allophonic rules or regular allomorphic rules.