We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Dysphagia is common in infants born with critical CHD. Thickened liquids are often used to treat dysphagia, but associated risks limit widespread use among feeding specialists. This survey aims to assess dysphagia treatment patterns and thickened liquid use across paediatric cardiac surgical centres.
Methods:
A 24-question, cross-sectional survey. Convenience and snowball sampling methods were used to engage 52 paediatric cardiac surgical centres affiliated with the Cardiac Newborn Neuroprotective Network. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse and compare responses.
Results:
Twenty-six individual respondents represented 21 unique paediatric cardiac surgical centres. Most responses were from experienced, speech–language pathologists (78%) at medium size centres (88%). Ninety-three percent of responding centres used thickened liquids to treat dysphagia and 81% only after formal instrumental assessment of swallowing. Thickened oral feeding was used for single-ventricle patients by 85% versus 69% for two-ventricle patients. Barriers to recommending thickened oral feedings included the cost of thickening agents, parental non-adherence, and gastrointestinal concerns.
Conclusions:
This is the first survey to report multi-institutional dysphagia treatment practice variation at United States congenital cardiac surgical centres. Thickened oral feedings are frequently used across centres in high-risk critical CHD patients but treatment benefit remains unclear. This survey highlights a broad scientific community poised to direct dysphagia research in critical CHD to address practice variation, short- and long-term impact of thickened oral feeding on feeding outcomes, and barriers to use and access of thickening agents.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.