For this article, I ask the question ‘Where is the behavioural revolution?’ My aim is to illuminate the discursive evolution of the behavioural revolution in American political science through a ‘non-rhetorical’ history of the behavioural revolution. I examine the way the analytic construct of the behavioural revolution evolved in the discourse of the discipline over time. I begin with an illustrative example drawn from contemporary reference material and then turn to an analysis of the writing of behaviouralists authors in the 1950s and early 1960s: Robert Dahl, Heinz Eulau, and David Easton. I then discuss the emergence of the behavioural revolution in the discourse of the discipline more generally and contrast a proponent of behaviouralism with a critic. I end the article with a discussion of the way that contemporary disciplinary historians understand the behavioural revolution. While the importance of the concept of the behavioural revolution is shown to be ongoing, the origin of the conventional use of ‘the behavioural revolution’ is traced to the late 1960s.