We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Radiotherapy aims to provide either curative treatment or palliation, with radiation transmission through shielding blocks ideally not exceeding 5% of the incident dose.
Aim:
This study assessed the attenuation efficacy of Cerrobend shielding blocks, determining the thickness required for achieving 95% attenuation and evaluating the adequacy of currently used blocks.
Methods:
An experimental study was conducted using a 1·25 MeV cobalt-60 teletherapy machine. Radiation intensities transmitted through Cerrobend blocks of varying thicknesses (1–5 cm) were measured with a calibrated ionization chamber and electrometer. Measurements were performed with a fixed field size of 10 cm × 10 cm at a 100-cm source-to-chamber distance, minimizing scatter. Baseline and transmitted intensities were recorded, with each measurement repeated five times for precision.
Results:
The percentage transmission, linear attenuation coefficients and thickness required for 5% transmission were calculated using regression analysis. Radiation intensity decreased exponentially with increasing Cerrobend block thickness, from 15·01 nC (0 cm) to 0·939 nC (5 cm thickness). Regression analysis showed a strong negative linear relationship (y = −0·5386x + 2·6705; R2 = 0·992). The thickness required for maximum transmission of 5% was determined to be 6 cm, while the routinely used 5 cm blocks at the study site allowed 8% transmission, exceeding the recommended threshold. Minimal environmental variations ensured measurement consistency.
Conclusion:
The study demonstrated that 6 cm Cerrobend blocks were necessary to achieve the recommended 95% attenuation, whereas the 5 cm blocks in use resulted in suboptimal shielding. This highlights the need to revise shielding practices to improve radiation protection and patient safety in resource-constrained radiotherapy settings.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.