We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Simulation materials for layperson first responder (LFR) trainings used in high-resource settings are prohibitively expensive for use in low- and low-middle income countries. To date, no structured approach to community-engaged design in identifying accessible and acceptable simulation materials for LFR trainings has been developed.
Methods
We conducted 2 workshops with male (18) and female participants (10) in a rural village in the Centre-Est region of Burkina Faso using principles of community-engaged research to define solutions for improvised LFR training materials.
Results
Participants reported a range of reactions to the use of live trainees and animal models for LFR training including considerations around gender sensitivity, use of animals for training purposes in regions of food insecurity, and religious and cultural barriers to consumption of meat after use for training purposes. A range of locally available options for training materials was identified by participants.
Conclusions
Significant sociocultural variability exists across low-resource environments with implications for the acceptability and availability of improvised materials for LFR training. Affected communities should be engaged in the selection and design of improvisation strategies to ensure context-appropriate adaptation.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.