To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Depression in adolescents involves complex interactions among depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, and suicidal symptoms. Network theory offers insights into dynamic symptom relationships during recovery.
Methods
Of 797 adolescents initially enrolled, 649 with complete baseline data were included in the network analyses; 458 and 277 participants were retained at the 1-month and 3-month follow-ups, respectively. Cross-sectional Gaussian Graphical Models and Cross-Lagged Panel Network (CLPN) analyses examined relationships among nine symptom domains: depression, somatic/subjective anxiety, sleep quantity/quality, daytime insomnia, passive/active sleepiness, and suicidal ideation/tendency. Network centrality and bootstrap validation assessed parameter stability.
Results
Cross-sectional networks showed structural invariance across timepoints (p>0.05). Subjective anxiety demonstrated highest centrality at T0-T1, while somatic symptoms dominated at T2. Depression maintained high closeness centrality throughout. Although betweenness centrality also suggested a central role for depression, its lower stability (CS < 0.5) necessitates a more cautious interpretation of this specific metric. CLPN revealed more predictive relationships during T0→T1 (76.5% significant edges) than T1→T2 (24.7%). Active sleepiness strongly predicted subsequent somatic anxiety (B=0.683) and depression (B=0.647). Suicide ideation-tendency showed stable bidirectional connections. Network stability was excellent (CS>0.5) except betweenness centrality.
Conclusions
Central symptoms evolved during recovery, with subjective anxiety initially dominant but somatic symptoms becoming central over time. The early post-treatment period showed heightened symptom network activity, with sleep disturbances identified as robust predictors of subsequent affective deterioration. Findings support dynamic, network-informed interventions targeting evolving symptom centrality and predictive pathways, particularly addressing sleep-related symptoms and suicide risk during critical recovery phases.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.