To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Digital interventions for promoting relaxation are increasingly popular, yet few combine multiple sensory modalities. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a fully digital relaxation program combining hypnotherapy with aromatherapy and explored whether the scent can induce a conditioned relaxation effect.
Methods
In this four-arm randomized controlled trial (N = 504), participants were assigned to one of four groups for a 4-week intervention: (a) combined (hypnotherapy + aromatherapy), (b) hypnotherapy-only, (c) aromatherapy-only, or (d) control (minimal intervention pause). Sessions were self-guided and delivered online every 2 days. The primary outcome was subjective calmness, assessed via the calmness–restlessness subscale of the Multidimensional Mood Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included perceived stress (PSS-10) and well-being (WHO-5). A fifth week with aromatherapy-only exposure was conducted in the combined and aromatherapy-only groups to test for conditioning.
Results
At post-intervention, both hypnotherapy-involved groups reported significant greater calmness than controls. The combined group showed a mean difference of β = 2.08 (95% CI: 0.50–3.65, p = 0.010, d = 0.38), while the hypnotherapy-only group showed β = 1.80 (95% CI: 0.24–3.37, p = 0.024, d = 0.33). Both effects were consistent across intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. Within-group improvements in calmness were also observed across all groups. No significant differences emerged from the conditioning test in week 5.
Conclusions
Digital hypnotherapy improved relaxation, with modest added benefit from aromatherapy. The results support the use of multisensory digital tools to enhance subjective calmness. However, no evidence for conditioned effects of the scent was observed under the current conditions.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.