Paediatric cardiac critical care continues to become more sub-specialised, and many institutions have transitioned to dedicated cardiac ICUs. Literature regarding the effects of these changes on paediatric critical care medicine fellowship training is limited.

To describe the current landscape of cardiac critical care education during paediatric critical care medicine fellowship in the United States and demonstrate its variability.

A review of publicly available information in 2021 was completed. A supplemental REDCap survey focusing on cardiac ICU experiences during paediatric critical care medicine fellowships was e-mailed to all United States Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited paediatric critical care medicine fellowship programme coordinators/directors. Results are reported using inferential statistics.

Data from 71 paediatric critical care medicine fellowship programme websites and 41 leadership responses were included. Median fellow complement was 8 (interquartile range: 6, 12). The majority (76%, 31/41) of programmes had a designated cardiac ICU. Median percentage of paediatric critical care medicine attending physicians with cardiac training was 25% (interquartile range: 0%, 69%). Mandatory cardiac ICU time was 16 weeks (interquartile range: 13, 20) with variability in night coverage and number of other learners present. A minority of programmes (29%, 12/41) mandated other cardiac experiences. Median CHD surgical cases per year were 215 (interquartile range: 132, 338). When considering the number of annual cases per fellow, programmes with higher case volume were not always associated with the highest case number per fellow.

There is a continued trend toward dedicated cardiac ICUs in the United States, with significant variability in cardiac training during paediatric critical care medicine fellowship. As the trend toward dedicated cardiac ICUs continues and practices become more standardised, so should the education.

Expert knowledge of cardiac malformations is essential for paediatric cardiologists. Current cardiac morphology fellowship teaching format, content, and nomenclature are left up to the discretion of the individual fellowship programmes. We aimed to assess practices and barriers in morphology education, perceived effectiveness of current curricula, and preferences for a standardised fellow morphology curriculum.

A web-based survey was developed de novo and administered anonymously via e-mail to all paediatric cardiology fellowship programme directors and associate directors in the United States of America; leaders were asked to forward the survey to fellows.

A total of 35 directors from 32 programmes (51%) and 66 fellows responded. Curriculum formats varied: 28 (88%) programmes utilised pathological specimens, 25 (78%) invited outside faculty, and 16 (50%) utilised external conferences. Director nomenclature preferences were split – 6 (19%) Andersonian, 8 (25%) Van Praaghian, and 18 (56%) mixed. Barriers to morphology education included time and inconsistent nomenclature. One-third of directors reported that <90% of recent fellow graduates had adequate abilities to apply segmental anatomy, identify associated cardiac lesions, or communicate complex CHD. More structured teaching, protected time, and specimens were suggestions to improve curricula. Almost 75% would likely adopt/utilise an online morphology curriculum.

Cardiac morphology training varies in content and format among fellowships. Inconsistent nomenclature exists, and inadequate morphology knowledge is perceived to contribute to communication failures, both have potential patient safety implications. There is an educational need for a common, online cardiac morphology curriculum that could allow for fellow assessment of competency and contribute to more standardised communication in the field of paediatric cardiology.