To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Rotational setup errors remain a challenge in radiotherapy centers without six-degree-of-freedom (6DoF) couch correction systems. Small angular deviations may compromise target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing. Although image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has improved setup verification, many centers continue to rely on three-degree-of-freedom (3DoF) couches.
Innovation:
This technical report evaluates an approximation in which small rotational setup deviations are represented as equivalent translational displacements using the vector cross-product formulation (Δ = θ × r). Head-and-neck, breast, lung, pelvis, and thorax scenarios were modeled using an Elekta Infinity linear accelerator and Monaco TPS (version 6.1.4.0) with Monte Carlo dose calculation. Simulated rotational perturbations were assessed with and without translation-based correction using dose–volume histogram endpoints Dmean, D95, and V95.
Discussion:
Translation-based correction improved D95 across all treatment sites. The largest improvement was observed in head-and-neck geometry (approximately 2%), while pelvic and thoracic scenarios demonstrated intermediate gains. Breast and lung cases showed measurable improvements. Dmean increased modestly, whereas V95 remained essentially unchanged, suggesting improved target coverage without compromising volumetric conformity.
Recommendations:
Translation-based correction is not a substitute for 6DoF couch technology but may provide a low-cost mitigation strategy for centers limited to 3DoF correction capability. Future studies should include phantom validation and automated correction approaches.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.