To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Oxytocin (OT) exerts widely modulatory effects on socio-emotional functions in humans, which can be achieved via enhancing the salience of social cues by interacting with the dopaminergic attention system. However, there is a lack of direct evidence for OT modulating attentional processing, with its underlying neural mechanisms remaining to be elucidated.
Methods
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, between-subject design, 60 healthy male participants were recruited. We combined pharmaco-electroencephalography with two modified tasks (a cue-target visual search [CTVS] task and a face distractor interference [FDI] task) to investigate whether intranasal OT can modulate attentional processing of social cues in top-down versus bottom-up task sets.
Results
In the CTVS task, OT accelerated participants’ response time to target faces, which was paralleled by a larger N170 and stronger theta power, suggesting that OT promoted early top-down attentional processing of social cues. In the FDI task, OT inhibited the distractive effect of task-irrelevant emotional faces in the first half of the task via facilitating top-down attentional control to targets as reflected by enhanced attentional selection (increased N2pc) and more efficient attentional processing (decreased P300). However, in the second half, OT switched from facilitating top-down attentional control to potentiating bottom-up attentional capture by emotional face distractors, as evidenced by OT reducing response accuracy but having no effects on the N2pc and P300.
Conclusions
Our findings not only provide evidence for the role of OT in modulating attentional processing of social cues but also lend support to its therapeutic potential in normalizing such attentional deficits.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.