Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of abbreviations
- Preface
- PART 1 Beyond regulatory control and multilateral flexibility: Gains from a cosmopolitan GATS
- PART 2 Unexplored economic, political and judicial dimensions of GATS
- PART 3 The limits of request–offer negotiations: Plurilateral and alternative approaches to services liberalisation
- PART 4 GATS case law: A first assessment
- PART 5 Market access, national treatment and domestic regulation
- PART 6 Unfinished business: Safeguard and subsidy disciplines for services
- 18 Recognition, standardisation and harmonisation: Which rules for GATS in times of crisis?
- 19 A safeguards regime for services
- 20 Waiting for Godot: Subsidy disciplines in services trade
- 21 Comment: One set of rules for fair and unfair trade in services: A possible merger?
- PART 7 Challenges to the scope of GATS and cosmopolitan governance in services trade
- PART 8 Conclusion
- Index
- References
18 - Recognition, standardisation and harmonisation: Which rules for GATS in times of crisis?
from PART 6 - Unfinished business: Safeguard and subsidy disciplines for services
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of abbreviations
- Preface
- PART 1 Beyond regulatory control and multilateral flexibility: Gains from a cosmopolitan GATS
- PART 2 Unexplored economic, political and judicial dimensions of GATS
- PART 3 The limits of request–offer negotiations: Plurilateral and alternative approaches to services liberalisation
- PART 4 GATS case law: A first assessment
- PART 5 Market access, national treatment and domestic regulation
- PART 6 Unfinished business: Safeguard and subsidy disciplines for services
- 18 Recognition, standardisation and harmonisation: Which rules for GATS in times of crisis?
- 19 A safeguards regime for services
- 20 Waiting for Godot: Subsidy disciplines in services trade
- 21 Comment: One set of rules for fair and unfair trade in services: A possible merger?
- PART 7 Challenges to the scope of GATS and cosmopolitan governance in services trade
- PART 8 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
With the suspension of the multilateral trade negotiations in July 2006, discussions about the scope of future rules in the WTO framework may seem futile. Although formally the suspension concerns only the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) and WTO Members can always revive the negotiations, it is unlikely that new rules will be agreed upon in the near future. Instead of reducing scholarly interest in the scope and content of future rules, the current situation should stimulate reflection and discussion. In fact, without the straitjacket of ongoing negotiations and the necessity of commenting on existing negotiation proposals, academics should seize the opportunity to reconsider some aspects of the conventional wisdom of the WTO system and engage in a critical and radically different discourse about the future of the trading system.
This chapter aims to contribute to such an exercise with regard to a limited area of WTO law. It concerns the content and scope of future General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) rules, in particular whether and to what extent GATS should incorporate provisions on recognition, standardisation or harmonisation. Recognition, standardisation and harmonisation are advanced instruments of trade liberalisation which can already be found in some WTO agreements, notably the Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT). The aim of these instruments is to reduce the trade-distorting effect of diverging domestic regulations in the territories of different WTO Members.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in ServicesWorld Trade Forum, pp. 407 - 433Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
, ‘The Bicycle Club: Affirming the American Interest in the Future of the World Trade Organization’, Address to the Washington International Trade Association, 12 November 2002, www.worldtradelaw.net/articles/bacchusbicycle.pdf.
, ‘Market Access through Mutual Regulation: The Promise and Limits of General Agreement on Trade in Services Article VII’, in: and (eds.), General Agreement on Trade in Services 2000 – New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization, 2000, p. 283.Google Scholar
and , ‘Telecommunications Services and the World Trade Organization’, Journal of World Trade 31 (1997), p. 5.Google Scholar
, ‘The World Trade Organization, Democracy and Development: A View From the South’, Journal of World Trade 40 (2006), p. 5.Google Scholar
, ‘Proportionality in World Trade Organization Law’, Journal of International Economic Law 4(2001), p. 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Domestic Policy Foundation and Domestic Policy Functions of International Trade Rules’, Aussenwirtschaft 41 (1986), p. 171.Google Scholar
, ‘The World Trade Organization “constitution” and proposed reforms: seven “mantras” revisited’, JIEL 4 (2001), p. 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Perspectives of World Trade Organization Law’, Journal of World Trade 35(1) (2001), p. 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, National Regulation and Trade Liberalization in Services – The Legal Impact of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (General Agreement on Trade in Services) on National Regulatory Autonomy (London: Kluwer Law International, 2003).Google Scholar
and , ‘The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’, Journal of World Trade 36 (2002), p. 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Necessity Revisited – Proportionality in World Trade Organization Law after Korea – Beef, EC –Asbestos and EC – Sardines’, Journal of World Trade 37 (2003), p. 199.Google Scholar
, Mutual Recognition of Regulatory Regimes: Some Lessons and Prospects, Jean Monnet Working Paper 7/1997, available at http://jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/97/97–07.html.
‘Non-Discriminatory Mutual Recognition: An Oxymoron in the New World Trade Organization Lexicon?’, in and (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 267–301.Google Scholar
and , ‘From Policed Regulation to Managed Recognition in General Agreement on Trade in Services’, in and (eds.), General Agreement on Trade in Services 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization (Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2000), p. 242.Google Scholar
and , (eds.), The World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement System 1995–2003 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004).
, ‘Rien ne va plus? Distinguishing Domestic Regulation from Market Access in General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and General Agreement on Trade in Services’, World Trade Review (2005), pp. 131–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Constitutional Functions and Constitutional Problems of International Economic Law (University of Fribourg Press, 1991).Google Scholar
, Winners and Losers – Impact of the Doha Round on Developing Countries (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment, 2006).Google Scholar
and , World Trade Organization-World Economic Order, World Trade Law (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006).Google Scholar
, ‘Comparative Advantage and the Normative Economics of International Trade Policy’, Journal of International Economic Law 1 (1998), p. 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Lessons for the General Agreement on Trade in Services from Existing World Trade Organization Rules on Domestic Regulation’, in and (eds.), Domestic Regulation and Service Trade Liberalization (Washington: World Bank, 2003) p. 57.Google Scholar
and , ‘Regulatory Reform and Trade Liberalisation in Accountancy Services’, in: and (eds.), Domestic Regulation and Service Trade Liberalization (Washington: World Bank, 2003), p. 147.Google Scholar
, ‘International Economic Order and Democratic Constitutionalism’, ORDO 34 (1983), p. 71.Google Scholar
, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 1
- Cited by