Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-bvshn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-06T10:23:16.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diminishing Surgical Site Infections in Australia: Time Trends in Infection Rates, Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance Using a Comprehensive Victorian Surveillance Program, 2002–2013

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2015

Leon J. Worth ,
Ann L. Bull ,
Tim Spelman ,
Judith Brett  and
Michael J. Richards
Leon J. Worth*
Affiliation:
Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) Coordinating Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
Ann L. Bull
Affiliation:
Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) Coordinating Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
Tim Spelman
Affiliation:
Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) Coordinating Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
Judith Brett
Affiliation:
Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) Coordinating Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
Michael J. Richards
Affiliation:
Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) Coordinating Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
*
Address correspondence to Associate Professor Leon J. Worth, Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) Coordinating Centre, Doherty Institute, 792 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia (leon.worth@mh.org.au).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate time trends in surgical site infection (SSI) rates and SSI pathogens in Australia.

DESIGN

Prospective multicenter observational cohort study.

SETTING

A group of 81 Australian healthcare facilities participating in the Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS).

PATIENTS

All patients underwent surgeries performed between October 1, 2002, and June 30, 2013. National Healthcare Safety Network SSI surveillance methods were employed by the infection prevention staff at the participating hospitals.

INTERVENTION

Procedure-specific risk-adjusted SSI rates were calculated. Pathogen-specific and antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) infections were modeled using multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression.

RESULTS

A total of 183,625 procedures were monitored, and 5,123 SSIs were reported. Each year of observation was associated with 11% risk reduction for superficial SSI (risk ratio [RR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–0.90), 9% risk reduction for deep SSI (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90–0.93), and 5% risk reduction for organ/space SSI (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93–0.97). Overall, 3,318 microbiologically confirmed SSIs were reported. Of these SSIs, 1,174 (35.4%) were associated with orthopedic surgery, 827 (24.9%) with coronary artery bypass surgery, 490 (14.8%) with Caesarean sections, and 414 (12.5%) with colorectal procedures. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently identified pathogen, and a statistically significant increase in infections due to ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli was observed (RR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10–1.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized SSI surveillance methods have been implemented in Victoria, Australia. Over an 11-year period, diminishing rates of SSIs have been observed, although AMR infections increased significantly. Our findings facilitate the refinement of recommended surgical antibiotic prophylaxis regimens and highlight the need for a more expansive national surveillance strategy to identify changes in epidemiology.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;00(0): 1–8

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , April 2015 , pp. 409 - 416
Copyright
© 2015 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Shepard, J, Ward, W, Milstone, A, et al. Financial impact of surgical site infections on hospitals: the hospital management perspective. JAMA Surg 2013;148:907–914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Agency, HP. Surveillance of surgical site infections in NHS hospitals in England, 2011/2012.www.hpa.org.uk. Published December 2012. Accessed August 1, 2013.Google Scholar
3. Edwards, JR, Peterson, KD, Andrus, ML, Dudeck, MA, Pollock, DA, Horan, TC. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Report, data summary for 2006 through 2007, issued November 2008. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:609–626.Google Scholar
4. Itani, KM, Wilson, SE, Awad, SS, Jensen, EH, Finn, TS, Abramson, MA. Ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2640–2651.Google Scholar
5. Sergeant, G, Buffet, W, Fieuws, S, de Gheldere, C, Vanclooster, P. Incisional surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: time to appraise its true incidence. Acta Chir Belg 2008;108:513–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Smith, RL, Bohl, JK, McElearney, ST, et al. Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg 2004;239:599–605; discussion 605–607.Google Scholar
7. Geubbels, EL, Nagelkerke, NJ, Mintjes-De Groot, AJ, Vandenbroucke-Grauls, CM, Grobbee, DE, De Boer, AS. Reduced risk of surgical site infections through surveillance in a network. Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:127–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. German, RR, Lee, LM, Horan, JM, Milstein, RL, Pertowski, CA, Waller, MN. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR Recom Rep 2001;50:1–35; quiz CE1–7.Google Scholar
9. Diaz-Agero Perez, C, Robustillo Rodela, A, Pita Lopez, MJ, Lopez Fresnena, N, Monge Jodra, V. Surgical wound infection rates in Spain: data summary, January 1997 through June 2012. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:521–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Brandt, C, Sohr, D, Behnke, M, Daschner, F, Ruden, H, Gastmeier, P. Reduction of surgical site infection rates associated with active surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:1347–1351.Google Scholar
11. Berrios-Torres, SI, Yi, SH, Bratzler, DW, et al. Activity of commonly used antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens against pathogens causing coronary artery bypass graft and arthroplasty surgical site infections in the United States, 2006–2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:231–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Antibiotic Expert Group. Therapeutic guidelines: antibiotic. Version 14. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited, 2010.Google Scholar
13. Russo, PL, Bull, A, Bennett, N, et al. Infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Victorian hospitals—VICNISS Hospital Acquired Infection Surveillance. Aust N Z J Public Health 2005;29:244–248.Google Scholar
14. Friedman, ND, Russo, PL, Bull, AL, Richards, MJ, Kelly, H. Validation of coronary artery bypass graft surgical site infection surveillance data from a statewide surveillance system in Australia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:812–817.Google Scholar
15. Russo, PL, Bull, A, Bennett, N, et al. The establishment of a statewide surveillance program for hospital-acquired infections in large Victorian public hospitals: a report from the VICNISS Coordinating Centre. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:430–436.Google Scholar
16. Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention. The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Patient Safety Component Manual.www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/PSC-Manual-portfolio.pdf. Published July 2013. Accessed August 1, 2013.Google Scholar
17. Horan, TC, Culver, DH, Gaynes, RP, Jarvis, WR, Edwards, JR, Reid, CR. Nosocomial infections in surgical patients in the United States, January 1986–June 1992. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1993;14:73–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Friedman, ND, Bull, AL, Russo, PL, Gurrin, L, Richards, M. Performance of the national nosocomial infections surveillance risk index in predicting surgical site infection in Australia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:55–59.Google Scholar
19. Takesue, Y, Watanabe, A, Hanaki, H, et al. Nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of pathogens isolated from surgical site infections (SSI) in Japan. J Infect Chemother 2012;18:816–826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Alasmari, FA, Tleyjeh, IM, Riaz, M, et al. Temporal trends in the incidence of surgical site infections in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a population-based cohort study, 1993 to 2008. Mayo Clin Proc 2012;87:1054–1061.Google Scholar
21. Skramm, I, Saltyte Benth, J, Bukholm, G. Decreasing time trend in SSI incidence for orthopaedic procedures: surveillance matters! J Hosp Infect 2012;82:243–247.Google Scholar
22. Yavuz, SS, Tarcin, O, Ada, S, et al. Incidence, aetiology, and control of sternal surgical site infections. J Hosp Infect 2013;85:206–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Worth, LJ, Spelman, T, Bull, AL, Richards, MJ. Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection in Australian hospitals: findings from a Victorian surveillance system. Med J Aust 2014;200:282–284.Google Scholar
24. Bennett, NJ, Bull, AL, Dunt, DR, et al. MRSA infections in smaller hospitals, Victoria, Australia. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:697–699.Google Scholar
25. Sievert, DM, Ricks, P, Edwards, JR, et al. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009–2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:1–14.Google Scholar
26. Cheng, AC, Turnidge, J, Collignon, P, Looke, D, Barton, M, Gottlieb, T. Control of fluoroquinolone resistance through successful regulation, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis 2012;18:1453–1460.Google Scholar
27. Worth, LJ, Slavin, MA, Vankerckhoven, V, Goossens, H, Grabsch, EA, Thursky, KA. Virulence determinants in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium vanB: clonal distribution, prevalence and significance of esp and hyl in Australian patients with haematological disorders. J Hosp Infect 2008;68:137–144.Google Scholar
28. Johnson, PD, Ballard, SA, Grabsch, EA, et al. A sustained hospital outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia due to emergence of vanB E. faecium sequence type 203. J Infect Dis 2010;202:1278–1286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Bratzler, DW, Dellinger, EP, Olsen, KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013;70:195–283.Google Scholar
30. Worth, LJ, Bull, AL, Richards, MJ. Public reporting of health care-associated infection data in Australia: time to refine. Med J Aust 2013;198:252–253.Google Scholar
31. van Dishoeck, AM, Koek, MB, Steyerberg, EW, van Benthem, BH, Vos, MC, Lingsma, HF. Use of surgical-site infection rates to rank hospital performance across several types of surgery. Br J Surg 2013;100:628–636; discussion 637.Google Scholar
32. Rioux, C, Grandbastien, B, Astagneau, P. The standardized incidence ratio as a reliable tool for surgical site infection surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:817–824.Google Scholar
33. Gustafson, TL. Three uses of the standardized infection ratio (SIR) in infection control. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:427–430.Google Scholar
34. Birnbaum, D, Zarate, R, Marfin A., SIR, you’ve led me astray!. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:276–282.Google Scholar
35. Pounds, LL, Montes-Walters, M, Mayhall, CG, et al. A changing pattern of infection after major vascular reconstructions. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2005;39:511–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Gastmeier, P, Schwab, F, Sohr, D, Behnke, M, Geffers, C. Reproducibility of the surveillance effect to decrease nosocomial infection rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:993–999.Google Scholar
37. Bull, A, Wilson, J, Worth, LJ, et al. A bundle of care to reduce colorectal surgical infections: an Australian experience. J Hosp Infect 2011;78:297–301.Google Scholar
38. Bull, AL, Russo, PL, Friedman, ND, Bennett, NJ, Boardman, CJ, Richards, MJ. Compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis—reporting from a statewide surveillance programme in Victoria, Australia. J Hosp Infect 2006;63:140–147.Google Scholar
39. Worth, LJ, Bull, AL, Thorpe, SM, Richards, MJ. Meeting national recommendations for surgical site infection surveillance: examples and lessons from the Victorian Healthcare-associated Infection Surveillance System. Healthcare Infect 2009;14:119–122.Google Scholar