An Alternative View on the Measurement of Intelligence and Its History

doi:10.1017/9781108770422.005

4 - An Alternative View on the Measurement of Intelligence and Its History

from Part I - Intelligence and Its Measurement

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2019

Paul De Boeck ,

Laurence Robert Gore ,

Trinidad González and

Ernesto San Martín

Edited by

Robert J. Sternberg

Show author details

Robert J. Sternberg: Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York

Book contents

Get access

Summary

IQ as a measure of intelligence is at the same time a success and a failure: a success because of the predictive value of IQ, and a failure because we do not know precisely what it is measuring. Intelligence has been defined in many ways. To discuss the definitional issue, we rely on Aristotle and his four ways to define something: explaining what it looks like, what it consists of, where it comes from, and what it is for. In this chapter we present an alternative view on how the measurement of intelligence has evolved and how it relates to different views on what intelligence is. The first initiatives to measure intelligence were inspired by physics and a strictly quantitative approach. These initiatives were based on the notion of general intelligence as mental energy, and led to tests to measure intelligence such as reaction times and perceptual discrimination (i.e., what intelligence looks like). IQ as a quantification of intelligence is from a later date and is based on a quite different type of test, inspired by an interest in what intelligence is for, as expressed in the work of some of the most famous intelligence test developers (e.g., Binet, Terman, Wechsler). The type of content of these tests is preserved in most intelligence tests today, mainly because of the predictive success of IQ tests. There now is also agreement that intelligence is not unitary but multidimensional. Robert Sternberg’s major endeavor to unravel processes has shown that there is no clear-cut answer to the question of what intelligence consists of in terms of cognitive processes or how processes can be measured. Other endeavors have resulted in measurement of genetic and environmental influences, in a revival of reaction time and discrimination measures, and in hypotheses about biological mechanics, such as mitochondrial efficiency. We conclude that intelligence is still a vague concept without much hope that it will be clarified soon, even though its measurement through a variety of cognitive tasks seems to work well from a predictive point of view.

Keywords

measurement history IQ definitional issues

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence , pp. 47 - 74

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770422.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agnoli, P., & D’Agostini, G. (2005). Why does the meter beat the second? https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0412078 Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas (1961). Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics (trans. John P. Rowan). Notre Dame, IN: Dumb Ox.Google Scholar

Barnes, B., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Social intelligence and decoding of nonverbal cues. Intelligence, 13, 263–282.Google Scholar

Barrett, P. T., Petrides, K. V., & Eysenck, H. J. (1998). Estimating inspection time: Response probabilities, the BRAT IT algorithm, and IQ correlations. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 405–419.Google Scholar

Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1905). Méthodes nouvelles pour le diagnostic du niveaux intellectuel des anormaux. L’Année Psychologique, 11, 191–244.CrossRef Google Scholar

Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1908). Le développement de l’intelligence chez les enfants. L’Année Psychologique, 14, 1–95.Google Scholar

Black, E. (2003). War against the weak: Eugenics and America’s campaign to create a master race. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.Google Scholar

Burt, C. (1949). The structure of the mind: A review of the results of factor analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 19, 100–111, 176–199.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cattell, J. M. (1890). Mental tests and measurements. Mind, 15, 373–380.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1–22.Google Scholar

Cianciolo, A. T., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Intelligence: A brief history. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

De Boeck, P. (2013). Intelligence, where to look, where to go? Journal of Intelligence, 1, 5–24.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Penke, L., & Johnson, W. (2010). The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nature Review Neuroscience, 11, 201–211.Google Scholar

Doehring, D. G., Reitan, R. M., & Kløve, H. (1961). Changes in patterns of intelligence test performance associated with homonymous visual field defects. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 123, 227–233.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. (1967). Intelligence assessment: A theoretical and experimental approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 37, 81–98.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1982). A model for intelligence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1988). The biological basis of intelligence. In Irvine, S. H. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Human abilities in cultural context. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar

Feldman Barrett, L. (2017). How emotions are made. The secret life of the brain. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1883). Inquiry into the human faculty and its development. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Geary, D. C. (2018). Efficiency of mitochondrial functioning as the fundamental biological mechanism of general intelligence. Psychological Review, 125, 1028–1050.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Giacomo, P. (1984). News from the BIPM. Metrologia, 20, 25–30.Google Scholar

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Goleman, D. (2006). Social intelligence: The new science of human relationships. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 13–23.Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293.Google Scholar

Gustaffson, J. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of human intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179–203.CrossRef Google Scholar

Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1937). The bi-factor method. Psychometrika, 2, 41–52.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L. (1968). Organization of abilities and the development of intelligence. Psychological Review, 75, 242–259.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystalized generalized intelligences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253–270.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., & Knapp, J. R. (1973). On the subjective character of the empirical base of Guilford’s structure-of-intellect model. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 33–43.Google Scholar

Hunt, E., Frost, N., & Lunneborg, C. (1973). Individual differences in cognition: A new approach to cognition. In Bower, G. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (vol.7, pp. 87–122). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hunt, E., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2013). Challenges for research on intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 1, 36–54.Google Scholar

Hunt, E., Lunneborg, C., & Lewis, J. (1975). What does it mean to be high verbal? Cognitive Psychology, 7, 194–227.Google Scholar

Intelligence and Its Measurement: A Symposium. (1921). Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 123–147.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1982). The chronometry of intelligence. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (vol.1, pp. 255–310). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. (2005). The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence, 33, 393–416.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., Raiford, S. E., & Coalson, D. L. (2016). Intelligent testing with the WISC-V. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Kell, H. J., & Lang, J. W. B. (2017). Specific abilities in the workplace: More important than g? Journal of Intelligence, 5, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5020013 Google Scholar

Kovacs, K., & Conway, A. R. A. (2016). Process overlap theory: A unified account of the general factor of intelligence. Psychological Inquiry, 27, 151–177.Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389–433.Google Scholar

Legg, S., & Hutter, M. (2007). A collection of definitions of intelligence. Technical report. www.researchgate.net/publication/1895883 Google Scholar

Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lichtenberger, O., & Kaufman, A. S. (2009). Essentials of WAIS-IV assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1993). The intelligence of emotional intelligence. Intelligence, 17, 433–442.Google Scholar

McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37, 1–10.Google Scholar

Melnick, M. D., Harrison, B. R., Park, S., Benneto, L., & Tadin, D. (2013). A strong interactive link between sensory discriminations and intelligence. Current Biology, 23, 1013–1017.CrossRef Google Scholar

Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J. Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., et al. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77–101.CrossRef Google Scholar

Plomin, R., & von Stumm, S. (2018). The new genetics of intelligence. Nature Review Genetics, 19, 148–159.Google Scholar

Rapaport, D., Gill, M., & Schafer, R. (1945). Diagnostic psychological testing, vol. 1.Chicago: The Year Book Publishers.Google Scholar

Rapaport, D., Gill, M., & Schafer, R. (1946). Diagnostic psychological testing, vol. 2. Chicago: The Year Book Publishers.Google Scholar

Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research.Google Scholar

Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2010). Individual differences, ageing, and IQ in two-choice tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 127–157.Google Scholar

Raven, J. C. (1938). Progressive matrices: A perceptual test of intelligence. London: Lewis.Google Scholar

Roid, G. H. (2003). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar

Roid, G. H., & Tippin, S. M. (2009). Assessment of intellectual strengths and weaknesses with the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales – Fifth Edition (SB5). In Naglieri, J. A. & Goldstein, S. (Eds.), Practitioner’s guide to assessing intelligence and achievement. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Santarnecchi, E., Emmendorfer, A., Tadayon, S., Rossi, S., Rossi, A., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2017). Network connectivity correlates of variability in fluid intelligence performance. Intelligence, 65, 35–47.Google Scholar

Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H. M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414–429.Google Scholar

Sheppard, L. D., & Vernon, P. A. (2008). Intelligence and speed of information-processing: A review of 50 years of research. Intelligence, 44, 535–551.Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1904a). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–295.Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1904b). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101.Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1923). The nature of ‘‘intelligence’’ and the principles of cognition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Stern, W. (1912). Die psychologischen Methoden der Intelligenzprüfung und deren Anwendung an Schulkindern. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1977a). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1977b). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84, 353–378.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Intelligence and non-entrenchment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 1–16.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1983). Components of human intelligence. Cognition, 15, 1–48.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2010). College admissions for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2018). Successful intelligence in theory, research, and practice. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 308–322). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Castejón, J. L., Prieto, M. D., Hautamäki, J., & Grigorenko, E. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (multiple-choice items) in three international samples: An empirical test of the triarchic theory of intelligence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 1−16.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. K. (Eds.) (1986). What is intelligence? Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J. A., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., et al. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Thomson, G. H. (1916). A hierarchy without a general factor. British Journal of Psychology, 8, 271–281.Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1921). Intelligence and its measurement: A symposium – I. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 124–127.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1924). The nature of intelligence. London: Kegan Paul, Trench Trubner & Co.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Todd, J., Coolidge, F., & Satz, P. (1977). The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Discrepancy Index: A neuropsychological evaluation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 450–454.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vernon, P. E. (1950). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Wagner, R. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Tacit knowledge and intelligence in the everyday world. In Sternberg, R. J. & Wagner, R. K. (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 51–83). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (1944). The measurement of adult intelligence (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (1975). Intelligence defined and undefined: A relativistic appraisal. American Psychologist, 30, 135–139.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2012). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence™ – Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children® – Fifth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar

Whitely, S. E. (1976). Solving verbal analogies: Some cognitive components of intelligence test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 234–242.Google Scholar

Whitely, S. E. (1977). Information processing on intelligence test items: Some response components. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 465–476.Google Scholar

Wissler, C. (1901). The correlation of mental and physical tests. Psychological Review, Monograph Supplement, 3 (6).Google Scholar

Wundt, W. (1902). Grundriss der Psychologie. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar

Yerkes, R. M. (1921). Psychological examining in the US Army. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 15. Washington: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.