Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-f9nfp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T05:51:53.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The theory of parallels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

John McCleary
Affiliation:
Vassar College, New York
Get access

Summary

This ought even to be struck out of the Postulates altogether; for it is a theorem … the converse of it is actually proved by Euclid himself as a theorem. … It is clear then from this that we should seek a proof of the present theorem, and that it is alien to the special character of postulates.

Proclus (410–85)

The most reliable information about Euclid and early Greek geometry is based on the commentaries of Proclus whose objections to Postulate V are stated in the quote. To its author and early readers the Elements provided an idealized description of physical space. From this viewpoint it is natural to understand the objections to Postulate V. The phrase “if produced indefinitely” strains the intuition based on constructions with compass and straight edge. Furthermore, Euclid studiously avoided using Postulate V for the first 28 propositions of Book I. The first application was to prove 1.29, the converse of 1.27 and 1.28. Several of the previous propositions are related to their neighbors as converses with proofs that simply observe the contradiction to the earlier statement were the converse false. Proposition 1.29 does not yield to this logic. Why introduce such an unnatural statement to prove it?

To eliminate this “blemish” on Euclid's great work, subsequent generations heeded Proclus's call and either sought a proof of Postulate V from the other assumptions, or they tried to replace it with a more self-evident assumption.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The theory of parallels
  • John McCleary, Vassar College, New York
  • Book: Geometry from a Differentiable Viewpoint
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173926.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The theory of parallels
  • John McCleary, Vassar College, New York
  • Book: Geometry from a Differentiable Viewpoint
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173926.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The theory of parallels
  • John McCleary, Vassar College, New York
  • Book: Geometry from a Differentiable Viewpoint
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173926.004
Available formats
×