Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:51:24.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Imaging evaluation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2009

Jay Heiken
Affiliation:
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In Western countries, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (pancreatic cancer) is the 4th–5th leading cause of cancer-related death, with over 200 000 cases annually. In the USA, it is estimated that 33 370 deaths resulted from pancreatic cancer in 2007 [1].

Clinical presentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma depends on its location. Because there are no reliable clinical or laboratory parameters to detect lesions early in the course of the disease, approximately 80–90% of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma present at an advanced stage (III or IV). Approximately 60–70% of these malignancies arise in the pancreatic head, and most come to clinical attention when patients present with weight loss and painless jaundice. The remainder, which arise in the body, tail or uncinate process, usually are clinically occult until a late stage when patients often present with non-specific symptoms such as weight loss or back pain [2].

Surgical resection of ductal adenocarcinoma offers the only chance for cure in the 10–20% of patients who present at an early stage (I or II). Patients who undergo complete surgical resection of the primary mass have improved 5-year survival [3].

As with detection, no reliable clinical or laboratory tests are available to predict cancer stage and determine the potential for surgical resection in a given patient [2–5]. Surgical triage of patients is predicated on accurate preoperative imaging to maximize benefit for potentially resectable patients and to spare potentially morbid surgery (in up to 20% of attempted resections) for those with advanced stage disease that is unlikely to be resectable [6,7].

Type
Chapter
Information
Pancreatic Cancer , pp. 58 - 82
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2007: year 2007 Surveillance Research from the American Cancer Society. Bathesda, MD: American Cancer Society, 2007.Google Scholar
Warshaw, A, Fernandez-Del Castillo, C.Pancreatic carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 455–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsistos, G, Farnell, M, Sarr, M.Are the results of pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer improving? World J Surg 1999; 23: 913–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warshaw, A, Gu, Z, Wittenberg, J, Waltman, A.Preoperative staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 1990; 125: 230–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasanen, P, Eskelinen, M, Partanen, K, et al. A prospective study of the value of imaging, serum markers and their combination in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma in symptomatic patients. Anticancer Res 1992; 12: 2309–2314.Google Scholar
Clarke, D, Thomson, S, Madiba, T, et al. Preoperative imaging of pancreatic cancer: a management oriented approach. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196: 119–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton, K. Multidetector CT and three dimensional imaging of the pancreas; state of the art. J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6: 126–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gouma, D, Geenen, R, Gulik, T, et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 786–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeny, PC, Marks, WM, Ryan, JA, Traverso, LW. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT. Radiology 1998; 166: 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, D, Vendantham, S, Krasny, R, et al. Two phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas and vascular structures. Radiology 1996; 199: 697–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boland, G, O'Malley, M, Saez, M, et al. Pancreatic phase versus portal vein phase helical CT of the pancreas: optimal temporal window for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172; 605–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, D, Reber, H, Krasny, R, Kadell, B, Sayre, J.Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic–phase, thin section helical CT. Am J Radiol 1997: 168: 1439–1443.Google ScholarPubMed
O'Malley, M, Boland, G, Wood, B, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: determination of unresectability with thin section pancreatic phase helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 1513–1518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargas, R, Nino Murcia, M, Trueblood, W, Jeffrey, RB. MDCT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: prediction of vascular invasion and resectability using a multiphasic techinque with curved planar reformations. Am J Radiol 2004; 182: 419–425.Google Scholar
Fishman, E, Horton, K, Urban, B.Multidetector CT angiography in the evaluation of pancreatic carcinoma: preliminary observations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 245: 849–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, N, Francis, I, Platt, J, et al. Multi-detector row helical CT of the pancreas: effect of contrast enhanced multiphasic imaging on enhancement of the pancreas, peripancreatic vasculature, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiology 2001; 220: 97–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richter, G, Wunsch, C, Schnider, B, et al. Hydro-CT in detection and staging of pancreatic carcinoma. Radiology 1998; 38: 279–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prokesch, R, Chow, L, Beaulieu, C, Bammer, R, Jeffrey, R.Isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinoma at multidetector row CT: secondary signs. Radiology 2002; 224: 764–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vedantham, S, Lu, D, Reber, D, Kadell, B.Small peripancreatic veins: improved assessment in pancreatic cancer patients using thin section pancreatic phase helical CT. Am J Radiol 1998; 170: 377–383.Google ScholarPubMed
Bipat, S, Phoa, SS, Delden, OM, et al. Ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and determining resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29: 438–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, D, Raman, S, Kadell, B, et al. Pancreatic phase multidetector CT angiography: performance in assessment of surgical resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 46 consecutive patients. [Abst.] RSNA 2007, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Zamboni, G, Kruskal, J, Vollmer, C, et al. Value of MDCT angiography in preoperative evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiology 2007; 245: 770–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weg, N, Scheer, M, Gabor, M.Liver lesions: improved detection with dual-detector array CT and routine 2.5 m thin collimation. Radiology 1998; 209: 417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, F, Rini, N, Keppke, A.MRI of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: W365–372 (web exclusive article).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ichikawa, T, Haradome, H, Hachiya, J, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: preoperative assessment with helical CT versus dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 202: 655–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irie, H, Honda, H, Kaneko, K, et al. Comparison of helical CT and MR imaging in detecting and staging small pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Abd Imaging 1997; 22: 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obuz, F, Dicle, O, Coker, A, Sagol, O, Karademir, S.Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: detection and staging with dynamic MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 2001; 38: 146–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shima, W et al. Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: comparison of mangofodipir enhanced MRI and contrast enhanced hydro CT. Am J Radiol 2002; 22: 429–433.Google Scholar
Leggmann, P, Vignaux, O, Dousset, B, et al. Pancreatic tumors: comparison of dual phase helical CT and endoscopic sonography. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 1315–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWitt, J, Devereaux, B, Chriswell, M, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Int Med 2004; 141: 753–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klapman, J, Chang, K, Lee, J, Nguyen, P.Negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasound in a large series of patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2658–2661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalra, M, Maher, M, Boland, G, Saini, S, Fischman, A.Correlation of positron emission tomography and CT in evaluating pancreatic tumors: technical and clinical implications. Am J Roentgenol 2003: 181: 387–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friess, H, Langhans, J, Ebert, M, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by 2(18F)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography. Gut 1995; 36: 771–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, C, Dehdashiti, F, Griffeth, L, et al. FDG PET evaluation of indeterminate pancreatic masses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20 363–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lytras, D, Connor, S, Bosonnet, L, et al. Positron emission tomography does not add to computed tomography for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Dig Disease 2005; 22: 55–61.Google Scholar
Quon, A, Chang, ST, Chin, F, et al. Initial evaluation of 18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET CT scanning for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur J Nuc Med Mol Imaging 2007; 35: 527–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×