Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Economic development, state power, and foreign policy
- 3 Inter-Korean relations: confrontation, economic exchanges, and the nuclear crisis
- 4 South Korea and the United States: from dependency to partnership
- 5 South Korea, Russia, and China: from adversaries to economic partners
- 6 South Korea and Japan: an ambivalent relationship
- 7 South Korea and the European Union: evolving cooperation and competition
- 8 South Korea and India: opportunities and obstacles
- 9 South Korea and the developing world: Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia
- 10 Contributing to the international community: from consumer to producer
- 11 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
4 - South Korea and the United States: from dependency to partnership
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Economic development, state power, and foreign policy
- 3 Inter-Korean relations: confrontation, economic exchanges, and the nuclear crisis
- 4 South Korea and the United States: from dependency to partnership
- 5 South Korea, Russia, and China: from adversaries to economic partners
- 6 South Korea and Japan: an ambivalent relationship
- 7 South Korea and the European Union: evolving cooperation and competition
- 8 South Korea and India: opportunities and obstacles
- 9 South Korea and the developing world: Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia
- 10 Contributing to the international community: from consumer to producer
- 11 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
South Korea’s most important bilateral relationship with regard to security and economics is with the United States. When the ROK–US alliance began formally after the Korean War, the relationship was a highly asymmetrical patron–client one. In the years that followed, Washington was the primary guarantor of ROK security and sponsor of its economy. In turn, South Korea had a difficult time opposing US wishes as Washington could wield heavy economic and military leverage to coerce Seoul’s compliance.
As South Korea’s economy developed, so too did its power and position within the alliance. South Korea developed a formidable military that assumed a greater share of its own defense while also contributing to US and international security operations. The ROK economy ended its dependence on US economic and military aid, becoming a major economic power in its own right. Seoul was able to push the limits of the alliance for greater freedom of movement and the ability to pursue ROK interests as its leaders saw them.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- South Korea's RiseEconomic Development, Power, and Foreign Relations, pp. 50 - 66Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
“Report by the National Security Council on the Position of the United States with Respect to Korea: NSC 8,” in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1948, vol. VI: The Far East and Australasia (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1974)
“Report by the National Security Council to the President: NSC 8/2,” in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1949, vol. VII: The Far East and Australasia (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1976), part 2, 976.
, The Reluctant Crusade: American Foreign Policy in Korea, 1941–1950 (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1985), 176Google Scholar
, “Crisis in Asia – An Examination of US Policy,” Department of State Bulletin 22 (1950): 111–18 (116–17)Google Scholar
, The American Age: US Foreign Policy at Home and Abroad (New York: W.W. Norton, 1994), 512Google Scholar
, Korean Politics: The Quest for Democratization and Economic Development (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999), 34–35Google Scholar
, From Deterrence to Engagement: The US Defense Commitment to South Korea (Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2006), 176–77Google Scholar
, A Strategic Framework for the Asian Pacific Rim: Looking toward the 21st Century (Washington, DC: Department of Defense, 1990), 7Google Scholar
, “US Forces Korea Transformation Update,” United States Army, January 12, 2010
, “Restructuring the US Military Presence in Korea: Implications for Korean Security and the US–ROK Alliance,” Korea Economic Institute – Academic Paper Series (2007)
, as quoted in “Regaining Wartime Operational Control,” Vantage Point 29:9 (September 2006), 23Google Scholar
, “News Transcript: US Forces Korea Media Roundtable,” US Forces Korea, September 9, 2006Google Scholar
, “General James Thurman – Statement before the House Armed Services Committee,” March 28, 2012
, “S. Korea, US to Discuss OPCON Transition in High-Level Meeting,” Yonhap News, July 19, 2013Google Scholar
, “South Korea’s Participation in the Vietnam Conflict: An Analysis of the US-Korean Alliance,” ORBIS (Winter 1978), 869–97Google Scholar
“The White House-Joint Statement of President Johnson and President Park on the Occasion of President Johnson’s State Visit to Korea,” Security Agreement Hearings (1970), Appendix No. 7, 1721
, “Report to Congress” on the progress of A Strategic Framework for the Asian Pacific Rim: Looking toward the 21st Century (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1991), 6Google Scholar
, “Text of Remarks at Camp Casey in Yongsan, South Korea,” January 6, 1992, in Public Papers of the President, 1992–1993 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1993), Book I, 43Google Scholar
, “President’s Remarks at the 2004 Republican National Convention,” September 2, 2004
, Strategic Survey 2006: The Annual Review of World Affairs (New York: Routledge, 2006), 298Google Scholar
, “Seoul’s Push to Regain Wartime Control from US Divides South Koreans,” Washington Post, August 29, 2006, A10Google Scholar
, China’s Rise and the Two Koreas: Politics, Economics, Security (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2009)Google Scholar
and , “How to Deal with South Korea,” Washington Quarterly 32:2 (Spring 2007): 71–82 (72)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Memorandum of Discussion at the 276th Meeting of the National Security Council,” February 9, 1956, in (ed.), Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961–1963, vol. XXIII: Southeast Asia (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1994), Part 2, 217
, “European Union, Trade with South Korea,” November 7, 2013
et al., “The US-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA): Provisions and Implications” (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, March 7, 2013)
“Korea-US FTA: Cost and Expected Benefits Decreased Prior to the Signing of the FTA,” Joongang Ilbo, April 30, 2007
, “The US-ROK Relationship – Prepared Statement before the US House of Representatives Committee on International Relations,” September 27, 2006
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.