Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-s74w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T13:11:49.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Milk production from diets of silage and dried forage. 1. Effects of methods of processing dried grass and of including barley in the supplementation of grass silage given ad libitum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. C. Tayler  and
K. Aston
J. C. Tayler
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
K. Aston
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Get access

Summary

1. Young adult and adult British Friesian female cattle (heifers and cows) which were lactating were individually fed on diets of grass silage ad libitum with supplements of dried grass, dried grass/barley or barley/groundnut in two randomized block experiments.

2. In Experiment I, equal quantities of dry matter (DM) as dried grass in the form of a wafer (W), cob (C) or pellet (P) were given with the silage during weeks 8 to 18 of lactation, to three groups of 12 heifers. Silage DM intakes were respectively 14·2, 14·3 and 15·8 ± 0·43 g/kg live weight per day (P<0·05). Milk yields were 14·0, 15·6, 16·7 ± 0·35 kg/day (P< 0·001). Milk composition and live-weight change did not differ significantly.

3. In Experiment II, five treatment groups of heifers and cows were offered silage with equal amounts of a supplement of either dried grass pellets (treatment 1) or dried grass/barley in the ratios of 2: 1 (treatment 2), 1: 2 (treatment 3), or a barley/groundnut supplement (treatment 4). In treatment 5 the cattle received the same supplement as in treatment 4, but at a 10% higher level. Silage DM intakes for treatments 1 to 5 during lactation weeks 6 to 22 were 8·64, 8·94, 7·96, 6·96, 7·63 kg/day (1, 2>4, P<0·01; 2>5, P<0·05). The intake of digestible organic matter, milk yields and live-weight changes over the whole experimental period were not influenced significantly by treatments 1 to 4, but in treatment 5 the milk was significantly higher in fat, protein and energy content than in treatments 1 to 4. Blood composition was normal and did not differ markedly between treatments.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , October 1976 , pp. 197 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock No. 2., Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 1967. Recommendation ASAE R2461. Method of determining modulus of uniformity and modulus of fineness of ground feed. Yb. Am. Soc. agric. Engrs 1967, p. 301.Google Scholar
Andersen, P. E. and Neimann-Sørensen, A. 1970. The place of artificially dried forages in cow rations. Study Commissions of Animal Nutrition and Cattle Production, EAAP, Gödöllö, Hungary, 1970.Google Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1965. Official Methods of Analysis. 10th ed. pp. 222–224. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. 1972. Milk composition. In Handbuch der Tierernahrung (ed. Lenkett, W., Breirem, K., and Crasemann, E.), Vol. 2, pp. 259–291. Parey, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Beardsley, D. W. 1964. Symposium on forage utilization: nutritive value of forage as affected by physical form. II. Beef cattle and sheep studies. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H. 1970. Feeding over the lactation cycle. In Dairy Nutrition, pp. 47–61. US Feed Grains Council, London.Google Scholar
Brown, D. C. and Radcliffe, J. C. 1971. Prediction of in vivo dry matter, organic matter, and energy digestibilities of silage by in vitro digestion techniques. Aust. J. agric. Res. 22: 787–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. and Milne, J. A. 1972. The nutritive value of processed roughages for milking cattle. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 1: 53–60.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. and Maynard, L. A. 1938. The relationship of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. J. Nutr. 15: 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J. and Kormos, J. 1973. The effect of level of feeding of dried grass on milk production and the value of dried grass as a replacement for conventional dairy concentrates. Anim. Prod. 16: 235–243.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Wainman, F. W. 1972. The nutritive value of processed roughages for fattening cattle and sheep. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 1: 61–72.Google Scholar
Head, M. J. 1953. The effect of quality and quantity of carbohydrate and protein in the ration of the sheep on the digestibility of cellulose and other constituents of the ration, with a note on the effect of adding vitamins of the B-complex on the digestibility and retention of the nutrients of a hay ration. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 43: 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsdale, C. R., Poutiainen, E. K. and Tayler, J. C. 1971. The growth of young cattle fed on dried grass alone and with barley. 1. Feed intake, digestibility and body gains. Anim. Prod. 13: 461–471.Google Scholar
McIlmoyle, W. A. and Murdoch, J. C. 1973. The use of dried grass as a component of concentrate mixtures for lactating dairy cows. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 2: 69–70.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. H., Kromann, R. and Garrett, W. H. 1965. Influence of roughage preparation on digestion. In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant (ed. Dougherty, R. W.), pp. 262–271. Butterworth, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board. 1970. Rep. Breed. Prod. Org. Milk Mktg Bd, No. 19, pp. 105–116.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board. 1971. Rep. Breed. Prod. Org. Milk Mktg Bd, No. 20, p. 149.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. 1963. The effect of pelleting and wafering on the feeding value of roughage —a review. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. M., Dew, S. M., Manston, R. and Faulks, M. 1970. The use of a metabolic profile test in dairy herds. Vet. Rec. 87: 150–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymond, W. F. 1968. Grassland research and practice. J. R. agric. Soc. 129: 85–105.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. 1970. Dried forages and beef production. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 25: 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayler, J. C., Crabtree, J. R. and Laws, J. R. 1974. Bull-beef production from grass; a comparison of barley and dried grass as supplements to pasture and silage in an 18-month system. Tech. Rep. No. 13 Grassld Res. Inst. Hurley,Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. and Wilkins, R. J. 1976. Conserved forage—complement or competitor to concentrates. In Principles of Cattle Production (ed. Swan, H. and Broster, W. H.). Proc. 23rd Easter School in Agricultural Science Univ. Nottingham 1975, pp. 343–364. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. and Wilkinson, J. M. 1973. The use of animals, land and purchased feeds in intensive systems of production of beef from grassland. IIIrd Wld Conf. Anim. Prod., Melbourne Vol. 3 (5c), pp. 32–41.Google Scholar
Tetlow, R. M. 1974. A method for determining particle size distribution in packages of dried forage. J. agric. Engng Res. 19: 347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, R. A., Tilley, J. M. A. and Outen, G. E. 1969. Effect of pH on cellulose digestion under in vitro conditions. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 20: 317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tukey, J. W. 1953. The problem of multiple comparisons. Princeton University (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Tyrrell, H. F. and Reid, J. T. 1965. Prediction of the energy value of cow's milk. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 1215–1223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilktns, R. J. 1973. The effects of processing on the nutritive value of dehydrated forages. Proc. 1st int. Green Crop Drying Congr., Oxford, pp. 119–134.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. F., Tilley, J. M. A. and Steemers, M. A-Th. 1964. Comparison of oven drying and toluene distillation in the determination of the dry-matter content of silage. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 15: 197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar