Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-fx4k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T16:52:19.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The performance of sows and litters penned individually or grouped in late lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. M. Petchey ,
T. L. Dodsworth  and
P. R. English
A. M. Petchey
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
T. L. Dodsworth
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
P. R. English
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
Get access

Abstract

Piglets in litters reared in groups from 3 to 7 weeks of age weighed less at weaning (7 weeks) than piglets in which litters were penned individually. Some of the difference between the two management systems was created within the week after grouping. Grouping sows and their litters did not initiate oestrus in lactation. The subsequent litter size of the grouped sows was reduced but between-treatment differences for this trait failed to reach significance at the 5% level.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , October 1978 , pp. 215 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Burger, J. F. 1952. Sex physiology of pigs. Onderstepoort J. vet. Res. 25: Suppl. no. 2.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. B. and Lamming, G. E. 1969. The lactational anoestrus of the sow: the status of the anterior pituitary-ovarian system during lactation and after weaning. J. Endocr. 43: 507–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
English, P. R. 1969. Mortality and variation in growth of piglets: a study of predisposing factors with particular reference to sow and piglet behaviour. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Lisle, A. 1968. More weaners without early weaning. Fmrs Weekly 69 (20): 76–77.Google Scholar
Loebel, J. and Schlegel, W. 1972. [Studies on the sexual behaviour of lactating sows and its relationship to breeding performance. Mh VetMed. 27: 302–304.Google Scholar
Melampy, R. M., Henricks, D. M., Anderson, L. L., Chen, C. L. and Shultz, J. R. 1966. Pituitary follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone concentrations in pregnant and lactating pigs. Endocrinology 78: 801–804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phelps, A. 1969. Batched sows served while suckling. Pig Fmg 17(3): 46–47.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, P., Boughton, H. G. and Bryant, M. J. 1975. Mating sows during lactation: observations from a commercial unit. Anim. Prod. 21: 233–241.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, P., Bryant, M. J. and van der Steen, H. A. M. 1977. The possible rdle of suckling behaviour in explaining the occurrence of lactational oestrus in sows. Anim. prod. 24: 155(Abstr.).Google Scholar
Sainsbury, D. 1972. Pig Housing. 3rd ed. Farming Press, Ipswich.Google Scholar
Whitten, W. K. 1967. Pheromones and mammalian reproduction. In Advances in Reproductive Physiology (ed. McLaren, A.), vol 1. Logos Press, London.Google Scholar