Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-hqrjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T21:08:41.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A revision of the north-western European species of the glomeratus-group of Apanteles Förster (Hymenoptera, Braconidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G. E. J. Nixon
G. E. J. Nixon
Affiliation:
c/o British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The north-western European species of the glomeratus-group of Apanteles are revised. Sixty-four species are dealt with, of which twentythree are described as new. Two species, A. pieridis (Bouché) and A. pilicornis Thomson, are lifted from synonymy. Host records are based mainly on reared specimens examined by the author.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , November 1974 , pp. 453 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ashmead, W. H. (1900). Notes on some New Zealand and Australian parasitic Hymenoptera, with descriptions of new genera and new species.—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 25, 327–360.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W. H. (1904). A list of the Hymenoptera of the Philippine Islands with description of new species.—Jl N. Y. ent. Soc. 12, 1–22.Google Scholar
Bouché, P. F. (1834). Naturgeschichte der Insekten besonders in Hinsicht ihrer ersten Zustände als Larven und Puppen. Lief. 1.—216 pp. Berlin.Google Scholar
Čapek, M. (1972). Verzeichniss der aus Schädlingsinsekten erzogenen Parasiten. Teil IV.—Die Brackwespen (Braconidae, Hymenoptera).—Ent. Problémy 10, 125–140.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. (1830). British Entomology 7.—321 pp. London.Google Scholar
Danilevskii, A. S. (1965). Photoperiodism and seasonal development of insects.—283 pp. Edinburgh, Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Delucchi, V., Tadić, M. & Bogavac, M. (1954). L'élevage en masse d'Apanteles plutellae Kurdj. (Hym., Braconidae) et d'Angitia tibialis Grav. (Hym., Ichneumonidae), parasites endophages de Plutellae maculipennis Curt., et notes biologiques sur ces parasites.—Zaštita bilja no. 21, 26–41.Google Scholar
Fahringer, J. (1925–1937). Opuscula braconologica. v. IV.–520 pp. Wien.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. (1961). Eine neue Apanteles-Art aus Jugoslawien (Hymenoptera, Braconidae).—Z. ArbGem. öst. Ent. 13, 4–5.Google Scholar
Gautier, C. & Riel, P. (1919). Description d'un Apanteles (Hym. Braconidae) parasite de Pionea forficalis (Lep. Pyralidae).—Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 309–312.Google Scholar
Haliday, A. H. (1833). An essay on the classification of the parasitic Hymeoptera of Britain, which correspond with the Ichneumones minuti of Linnaeus.—Ent. Mag. 1, 259–276.Google Scholar
Haliday, A. H. (1834). An essay on the classification of parasitic Hymenoptera.—Ent. Mag. 2, 225–259.Google Scholar
Kurdjumov, N. V. (1912). Hyménoptères-parasites nouveaux ou peu connus.—Russk. ent Obozr. 12, 223–240.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae, ed. 10, I.‒823 pp.Google Scholar
Lyle, G. T. (1916). Contributions to our knowledge of the British Braconidae. 3.—Entomologist 49, 268–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyle, G. T. (1917). Contributions to our knowledge of the British Braconidae. 3.—Entomologist 50, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyle, G. T. (1925). Some Braconidae new to Britain.—Entomologist's mon. Mag. 61, 118–123.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. A. (1885). Monograph of the British Braconidae, I.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 1885, 1–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. A. (1897). In André. Species des Hymenoptères d'Europe et d'Algérie. 5 bis. 180–181. Beaune.Google Scholar
Meyrick, E. (1968). Revised handbook of British Lepidoptera. Rev. ed.—914 pp. Hampton, Middlesex, E. W. Classey.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. (1920). A revision of the North American species of ichneumon-flies belonging to the genus Apanteles.—Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 58, 483–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. & Dohanian, S. M. (1927). A study in hyperparasitism, with particular reference to the parasites of Apanteles melanoscelus, (Ratzeburg).—Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 1487, 35 pp.Google Scholar
Nees Von Esenbeck, C. G. D. (1834). Hymenoptorum Ichneumonibus affinium monographiae, genera Europaea et species illustrantes, I.—320 pp. Stuttgart and Tübingen.Google Scholar
Nixon, G. E. J. (1965). A reclassification of the tribe Microgasterini (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).—Bull. Br. Mus. not. Hist. (Ent.). Suppl. 2, 1–284.Google Scholar
Nixon, G. E. J. (1972). A revision of the north-western European species of the laevigatus-group of Apanteles Förster (Hymenoptera, Braconidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 61, 701–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, G. E. J. (1973). A revision of the north-western European species of the vitripennis, pallipes, octonarius, triangulator, fraternus, formosus, parasitellae, metacarpalis and circumscriptus-groups of Apanteles Förster (Hymenoptera, Braconidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 63, 169–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papp, J. (1973). A revision of the C. G. Thomson species of Apanteles Först. (Hym. Braconidae: Microgasterinae).—Ent. scand. 4, 59–64.Google Scholar
Ratzeburg, J. T. C. (1844–1952). Die Ichneumonen der Forstinsecten in forstlicher und entomologischer Beziehung, als Anhang zur Abbildung und Beschreibung der Forstinsecten, 1–3. 224; 238; 272 pp. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhard, H. (1880). Beiträge zur Kenntniss einiger Braconiden-Gattungen.—Dt. ent. Z. 24, 353–370.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H. (1881). Beiträge zur Kenntniss einiger Braconiden-Gattungen.—Dt. ent. Z. 25, 33–52.Google Scholar
Riley, C. V. (1887). Report of the Entomologist, for the year 1886.—v + 34 + ix pp. Washington, U.S. Dep. Agric.Google Scholar
Roman, A. (1912). Die Ichneumonidentypen C. P. Thunbergs.—Zool. Bidr. Upps. 1, 229–293.Google Scholar
Telenga, N. A. (1955). Fam. Braconidae, subfamilies Microgasterinae, Agathinae.—Fauna Rossĭi (Hymenoptera) 5 (4), 311 pp. Moscow & Leningrad.Google Scholar
Thomson, C. G. (1869–1997). Opuscula entomologica.—2452 pp. Lund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thunberg, C. P. (1824). Ichneumonidea Insecta Hymenoptera illustrata.—Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Petersb. 9, 285–368.Google Scholar
Viereck, H. L. (1913). Descriptions of six new genera and twelve new species of ichneumonflies.—Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 44, 639–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesmael, C. (1837). Monographie des Braconides de Belgique.—Nouv. Mem. Acad R. Sci. Bruxelles 10, 68 pp.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S. (1932). A revision of the Ethiopian species of the genus Apanteles (Hym. Bracon.).—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 80, 301–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S. (1936). A new palearctic species of Apanteles (Hym. Brae.).—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 5, 174–176.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S. (1937). On two new Palearctic species of Apanteles. (Hym., Brae.).—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 6, 65–72.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S. (1939). On two new species of Apanteles (Hym. Brac.) not previously recognised from the Western Palearctic Region.—Bull. ent. Res. 30, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S. (1940). On the identity of Apanteles praepotens Haliday (Hym. Braconidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 31, 141–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S. (1945). Description of Palearctic species of Apanteles (Hymen. Braconidae).—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 95, 35–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar