Hostname: page-component-754f97d4cd-l2v4j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-20T17:38:00.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition between Two Species of Mites.: II. Factors Influencing Intensity1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

W. H. Foott
W. H. Foott
Affiliation:
Research Station, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Harrow, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Production of webbing, greater fecundity, faster rate of development, and greater ability to thrive on foliage injured by feeding enabled populations of T. telarius to suppress those of P. ulmi on peach foliage in a greenhouse and insectary. However, these inhibitory factors were non-operative in an orchard environment in southwestern Ontario.

The tendency of the two species to populate different levels of a host plant, and of P. ulmi to utilize the upper surfaces of leaves more than T. telarius, each decreased the intensity of competition. The suppression of P. ulmi in an insectary or greenhouse was delayed but not prevented by the above factors.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 95 , Issue 1 , January 1963 , pp. 45 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Blair, C. A., and Groves, J. R.. 1952. Biology of the fruit tree red spider mite Metatetranychus ulmi (Koch) in south-east England. J. Hort. Sci. 27: 14–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cagle, L. R. 1946. Life history of the European red mite. Virg. Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 98.Google Scholar
Cagle, L. R. 1949. Life history of the two-spotted spider mite. Virg. Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 113.Google Scholar
Davis, D. W. 1952a. Influence of population density on Tetranychus multisetis. J. Econ. Ent. 45: 652–654.Google Scholar
Davis, D. W. 1952b. Some effects of DDT on spider mites. J. Econ. Ent. 45: 1011–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foott, W. H. 1962. Competition between two species of mites. I. Experimental results. Can. Ent. 94: 365–375.Google Scholar
Garlick, W. G. 1929. Notes on the red spider on bush fruits, T. telarius L. Ann. Rept. Ent. Soc. Ont. (1928): 86–93.Google Scholar
Georgala, M. B. 1955. The biology of orchard mites in the Western Cape Province. Union S. Africa Dept. Agr. Sci. Bull. 360.Google Scholar
Gilliatt, F. C. 1935. The European red mite, Paratetranychus pilosus C. & F. in Nova Scotia. Can. J. Res., Sec. D. 13: 1–17.Google Scholar
Newcomer, E. J., and Yothers, M. A.. 1929. Biology of the European red mite in the Pacific Northwest. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 89.Google Scholar
Paradis, R. O. 1955. Cycle évolutif du Tétranyque à deux points, Tetranychus bimaculatus Harvey (Acari: Tetranychidae), dans le sud-ouest du Québec. Le Naturaliste Canadien 82: 5–29.Google Scholar
Parent, B., and Beaulieu, A. A.. 1957. Life-history of the European red mite. Can. Ent. 89: 328–333.Google Scholar
Putman, W. L. 1962. Life-history and behaviour of the predacious mite Typhlodromus (T.) caudiglans Schuster (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in Ontario, with notes on the prey of related species. Can. Ent. 94: 163–177.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, J. G. 1958. The comparative NPK nutrition of Panonychus ulmi (Koch) and Tetranychus telarius (L.) on apple trees. J. Econ. Ent. 51: 369–373.Google Scholar
Ross, W. A., and Robinson, W.. 1922. Notes on the plum spider mite or red spider. Ann. Rpt. Ent. Ont. (1921): 33–42.Google Scholar