Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-lrvh5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T06:48:40.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of soil physical conditions produced by various cultivation systems on the root development of winter wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. R. Finney  and
B. A. G. Knight
J. R. Finney
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Ltd., Jealott's Hill Research Station, Brachnell, Berkshire
B. A. G. Knight
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Ltd., Jealott's Hill Research Station, Brachnell, Berkshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The results of a field experiment on winter wheat are presented in which the effects of the soil physical properties produced by different cultivation systems were studied in relation to root development.

The extension rate of the seminal root axes was slower in undisturbed or shallow (5 cm) cultivated soil than in ploughed or deep (20 cm) cultivated soil leading to earlier lateral branching and the production of an effectively shallower seminal root system which persisted throughout the season. During the first four weeks after drilling the soil in the ploughed and the deeper cultivated plots was of lower bulk density and there were more pores of a diameter suitable for unimpeded root extension. It is suggested that seminal root development in uncultivated soils, which are less readily deformed than cultivated ones, is related to the probability of the extending seminal axes contacting pores of suitable dimensions.

The implications of shallower rooting are discussed and related to field experience with cereal crops drilled directly into uncultivated soils where success has consistently been achieved on free-draining, open-textured soils.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 80 , Issue 3 , June 1973 , pp. 435 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Babley, K. P. & Graecon, E. L. (1967). Mechanical resistance as a soil factor influencing the growth of roots and underground shoots. Adv. Agron. 19, 1–43.Google Scholar
Brotjwer, R. (1966). Root growth of cereals and grasses. In Proc. 12th Easter School, Univ. Nottingham, 1963. pp. 153–66. London: Butterworth and Co.Google Scholar
Cornforth, I. S. (1968). Relationships between soil volumes used by roots and nutrient accessibility. J. Soil Sci. 19, 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, W. R. & Miller, R. D. (1956). A method for study of the influence of mechanical impedance and aeration on the growth of seedling roots. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 20, 154–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, A. E. M., Jameson, H. R. & Cottebell, R. (1963). Destruction of pastures by paraquat as a substitute for ploughing. Nature, Lond. 197, 748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeater, R. S. L. (1967). Agronomic aspects of directdrilling. Proc. (Eighth) br. Weed Control Conf. 3, 874–83.Google Scholar
Ozanne, P. G., Asher, C. J. & Kirton, D. J. (1965). Root distribution in a deep sand and its relationship to the uptake of added potassium by pasture plants. Aust. J. agric. Res. 16, 785–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, E. W. (1945). What are the minimum cultivations necessary for high farming. Proc. Instn Br. agric. Engrs 3, 99–109.Google Scholar
Schuurman, J. T. & Goedewaagen, M. A. (1965). Methods for the examination of root systems and roots. Centre for Agric. Publications and Documentation, Wageningon.Google Scholar
Stranak, A. (1968). Soil compaction and direct-drilling of cereals. Outl. Agric. 5, 241—46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welbeck, P. J. & Williams, E. D. (1968). Root growth of a barley crop estimated by sampling with powered soil-coring equipment. J. appl. Ecol. 5, 477–81.Google Scholar