Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-7262s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T10:24:48.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of a reduction in food intake during late pregnancy on nitrogen metabolism in ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. A. Guada
Affiliation:
The Rowett Besearch Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
J. J. Robinson
Affiliation:
The Rowett Besearch Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
C. Fraser
Affiliation:
The Rowett Besearch Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB

Summary

Twelve Finnish Landrace × Dorset Horn ewes with a mean litter size of 1·92 and a mean body weight of 75±3 kg were individually penned from 80 days of gestation to parturition and offered a diet with a metabolizable energy (ME) and crude protein content in the dry matter of 9·7 MJ/kg and 11·4% respectively. At 120 days of gestation daily ME intake was abruptly reduced from a mean of 0·48 to 0·25 MJ/kg W0·75 for a period of 10 days.

The observed increase in the plasma concentration of urea due to the reduction in food intake was better correlated with lamb birth weight (r = 0·87) than was the increase in plasma free fatty acid concentration (r = 0·53) or the decrease in plasma glucose concentration (r = 0·76). Mean daily nitrogen balance decreased from a mean of 5·6 g before food restriction to – 1·8 g after food restriction. Although the effect was not significant, single bearing ewes excreted more total and urea nitrogen in the urine than multiple bearing ewes before food restriction. During food restriction the trend was reversed. The change in urea nitrogen excretion (Y, g/day) that resulted from the reduction in food intake was correlated (r = 0·73, P < 0·01) with lamb birth weight (X, kg); the relationship was Y = 0·54(±0·16)X – 3·48. It was estimated that the daily loss of nitrogen from the maternal body during the period of food restriction was approximately 80% of published values for the urinary nitrogen excretion of fasting non-pregnant sheep.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable