Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-jkvpf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T20:44:11.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laryngotracheal augmentation using titanium mesh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2007

A A Gaafar*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, University of Alexandria, Egypt
A A El-Daly
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, University of Alexandria, Egypt
H A Gaafar
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, University of Alexandria, Egypt
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Alaa Gaafar, Fakhry Hospital, 251 Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia. Fax: +966 3 8641107 E-mail: gaafar_a@hotmail.com

Abstract

Background:

The management of laryngotracheal stenosis is still a serious surgical challenge. The fact that there are currently numerous reconstruction procedures indicates that there is at present no standard treatment.

Study design:

Titanium mesh was used instead of traditional homografts in reconstruction of the anterior laryngotracheal wall in 12 tracheostomised patients with benign chronic laryngotracheal stenosis. The anterior laryngotracheal wall was split, followed by excision of scar tissue and fixation of the titanium plate at the split end. A Silastic® stent was inserted above the tracheostomy tube and fixed in place by running sutures fixed to the skin by buttons. The stent was removed endoscopically six weeks later and a trial of decannulation was undertaken.

Results:

Endoscopically, good epithelisation was seen on the inner surface of the mesh in 10 cases and decannulation was possible. Four of these patients required endoscopic debulking of granulation tissue. Decannulation was impossible in two cases, one due to excessive granulation tissue and the other due to prolapse of the titanium mesh into the tracheal lumen (the mesh was removed endoscopically and a Montgomery T-tube inserted).

Conclusion:

Titanium mesh was found to be a good alternative for augmentation of the anterior laryngotracheal wall. It offered rigid support, with fewer of the complications reported with other grafts.

Information

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable