Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-z2ts4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T20:01:34.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social support, self-esteem and depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

G. W. Brown*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Science and Social Policy, Royal Holloway and Bedford New College, London
B. Andrews
Affiliation:
Department of Social Science and Social Policy, Royal Holloway and Bedford New College, London
T. Harris
Affiliation:
Department of Social Science and Social Policy, Royal Holloway and Bedford New College, London
Z. Adler
Affiliation:
Department of Social Science and Social Policy, Royal Holloway and Bedford New College, London
L. Bridge
Affiliation:
Department of Social Science and Social Policy, Royal Holloway and Bedford New College, London
*
1Address for correspondence: Professor G. W. Brown, Department of Social Science and Social Policy, Royal Holloway and Bedford New College, 11 Bedford Square, London WC1B 3RA.

Synopsis

A prospective study of 400 largely working-class women with children living at home has used measures of self-esteem and ‘social support’ to predict the risk of depression in the following year once a stressor had occurred. Actual support received at the time of any crisis in the follow-up year was also measured. Self-esteem was correlated quite highly with some of the measures of support.

A core tie was defined as a husband, lover or someone named as very close at first contact. Negative evaluation of self (i.e. low self-esteem), and various indices of lack of support from a core tie at the first interview, were associated with a greatly increased risk of subsequent depression once stressor occurred. Lack of support from a core tie at the time of the crisis was particularly highly associated with an increased risk. There was also a high risk among those who were ‘let down’ - that is, for those who did not receive the support which they might have expected in terms of the first interview material. It is concluded that it is essential for prospective enquiries to take account of the actual mobilization of support in the follow-up period.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable