Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-lfk5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T16:37:37.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gender, Social support and recovery from depressive disorders: a prospective clinical study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

T. S. Brugha*
Affiliation:
MRC Social Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, London.
P. E. Bebbington
Affiliation:
MRC Social Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, London.
B. MacCarthy
Affiliation:
MRC Social Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, London.
E. Sturt
Affiliation:
MRC Social Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, London.
T. Wykes
Affiliation:
MRC Social Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, London.
J. Potter
Affiliation:
MRC Social Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, London.
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr T. Brugha, Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, PO Box 65, Leicester LE2 7LX.

Synopsis

One hundred and thirty men and women attending psychiatric hospitals with depressive disorders were interviewed at the time of their initial contact. After a mean four month interval, 119 were reassessed in order to test the hypothesis that initial levels of social support predict clinical improvement even when other potential risk factors such as age, sex, diagnosis and severity of depression are controlled. Severity and duration of the episode emerged as the only significant background predictors of recovery. The explained variance in recovery from depression due to social support was equal in men and women, and was not diminished by the background clinical predictors. According to subset analyses however, the aspects of personal relationships and perceived support that predict recovery in men and in women appear to be different. The available multiple regression models of outcome favoured a main effect of social support and provided persuasive if inconclusive evidence for a statistical interaction effect with sex. The implications for further research and for theory are discussed.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable