Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-htx7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-01T07:08:10.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Signal Detection Models with Random Participant and Item Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Jeffrey N. Rouder ,
Jun Lu ,
Dongchu Sun ,
Paul Speckman ,
Richard Morey  and
Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Jeffrey N. Rouder*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Columbia
Jun Lu
Affiliation:
American University
Dongchu Sun
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Columbia
Paul Speckman
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Columbia
Richard Morey
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Columbia
Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Columbia
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Jeffrey N. Rouder, Department of Psychological Sciences, 210 McAlester Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. E-mail: rouderj@missouri.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The theory of signal detection is convenient for measuring mnemonic ability in recognition memory paradigms. In these paradigms, randomly selected participants are asked to study randomly selected items. In practice, researchers aggregate data across items or participants or both. The signal detection model is nonlinear; consequently, analysis with aggregated data is not consistent. In fact, mnemonic ability is underestimated, even in the large-sample limit. We present two hierarchical Bayesian models that simultaneously account for participant and item variability. We show how these models provide for accurate estimation of participants’ mnemonic ability as well as the memorability of items. The model is benchmarked with a simulation study and applied to a novel data set.

Keywords

recognition memorytheory of signal detectionBayesian modelshierarchical modelsMCMC methods

Information

Type
Application Reviews and Case Studies
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 72 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 621 - 642
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This research is supported by NSF grants SES-0095919 and SES-0351523, NIH grant R01-MH071418, a University of Missouri Research Leave grant and fellowships from the Spanish Ministry of Education and the University of Leuven, Belgium.

References

Albert, J., Chib, S. (1995). Bayesian residual analysis for binary response regression models.. Biometrika, 82, 747–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, W.J., Draper, D. (2000). Implementation and performance issues in the Bayesian and likelihood fitting of multilevel models.. Computer Statistics, 15, 391–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devroye, L. (1986). Non-uniform random variate generation, New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfand, A., Smith, A.F.M. (1990). Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities.. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., Rubin, D.B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis 2nd ed.,, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Gillund, G., Shiffrin, R. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.. Psychological Review, 91, 97–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glanzer, M., Adams, J.K., Iverson, G.J., Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory.. Psychological Review, 100, 546–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glanzer, M.A., Kim, K., Hilford, A., Adams, J.K. (1999). Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 500–513.Google Scholar
Hautus, M.J., Lee, A.L. (1998). The dispersions of estimates of sensitivity obtained from four psychophysical procedures: Implications for experimental design.. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 638–649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heathcote, A. (2003). Item recognition memory and the receiver-operating characteristic.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 1210–1230.Google ScholarPubMed
Hobert, J.P., Casella, G. (1996). The effect of improper priors on Gibbs sampling in hierarchical linear mixed models.. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 1461–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, L.L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, H. (1982). Theory of probability., New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kane, M.J., Hambrick, D.Z., Tuholski, S.W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T.W., Engle, R.E. (2004). The generality of working-memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuo-spatial memory span and reasoning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucera, H., Francis, W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English., Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Lu, J., Speckman, P.L., Sun, D., & Rouder, J. (submitted). An objective Bayesian approach for assessing conscious and unconscious processes in human memory.Google Scholar
Macmillan, N.A., Creelman, C.D. (2001). Detection theory: A user's guide., New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, J.L., Chappell, M. (1994). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory.. Psychological Review, 101, 103–128.Google Scholar
Miller, E., Lewis, P. (1977). Recognition memory in elderly patients with depression and dementia: A signal detection analysis.. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 84–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.F., Grondlund, S.D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves.. Psychological Review, 99, 518–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, G.O., Sahu, S.K. (1997). Updating schemes, correlation structure, blocking and parametrization for the Gibbs sampler.. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Methodological, 59, 291–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouder, J.N., Lu, J. (2005). An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection.. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 573–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rouder, J.N., Lu, J., Morey, R.D., Sun, D., & Speckman, P.L. (submitted). A hierarchical process dissociation model..Google Scholar
Salthouse, T.A. (1996). The processing speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiffrin, R.M., Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM—Retrieving effectively from memory.. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, M., Gagnon, N., Richard, E. (2002). Strategies of text retrieval: A criterion shift account.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snodgrass, J.G., Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spieler, D.H., Balota, D.A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level.. Psychological Science, 8, 411–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stretch, V., Wixted, J.T. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1379–1396.Google ScholarPubMed
Sun, D., Berger, J. (1998). Reference priors under partial information.. Biometrika, 85, 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, D., & Berger, J.O. (2006). Objective priors for the multivariate normal model. Bayesian Statistics, 8.Google Scholar
Tanner, J.W.P., Birdsall, T.G. (1958). Definition of d' and n as psychophysical measures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 922–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, L. (1994). Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions.. Annals of Statistics, 22, 1701–1728.Google Scholar
Wickelgren, W.A. (1968). Unidimensional strength theory and component analysis of noise in absolute and comparative judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 5, 102–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wishart, J. (1928). A generalized product moment distribution in samples from normal multivariate population.. Biometrika, 20, 32–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar