Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-92wsb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T04:14:00.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Internal Consistency of Tests: Analyses Old and New

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Lee J. Cronbach
Lee J. Cronbach*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Lee J. Cronbach, Center for the Study of Youth Development, Building 460, Stanford University, CA 94305.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A coefficient derived from communalities of test parts has been proposed as greatest lower bound to Guttman's “immediate retest reliability.” The communalities have at times been calculated from covariances between item sets, which tends to underestimate appreciably. When items are experimentally independent, a consistent estimate of the greatest defensible internal-consistency coefficient is obtained by factoring item covariances. In samples of modest size, this analysis capitalizes on chance; an estimate subject to less upward bias is suggested. For estimating alternate-forms reliability, communality-based coefficients are less appropriate than stratified alpha.

Keywords

communalityinternal-consistencyreliability

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , March 1988 , pp. 63 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

I thank Edward Haertel for comments and suggestions, and Andrew Comrey for data.

References

Bentler, P. M. (1972). A lower bound method for the dimension-free measurement of internal consistency. Social Science Research, 1, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M., Woodward, J. A. (1980). Inequalities among lower bounds to reliability: With applications to test construction and factor analysis. Psychometrika, 45, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M., Woodward, J. A. (1983). The greatest lower bound to reliability. In Wainer, H., Messick, S. (Eds.), Principals of modern psychological measurement (pp. 237–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Comrey, A. L. (1970). EITS manual for the Comrey Personality Scales, San Diego: Educational & Industrial Test Service.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1947). Test “reliability”: Its meaning and determination. Psychometrika, 12, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., Ikeda, H., Avner, R. A. (1964). Intraclass correlation as an approximation to the coefficient of generalizability. Psychological Reports, 15, 727–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., Schönemann, P., McKie, D. (1965). Alpha coefficients for stratified-parallel tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Riccia, G., Shapiro, A. (1980). Minimum rank and minimum trace of covariance matrices, Beer-Sheva, Israel: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, department of Mathematics.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10, 255–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, P. W., Agunwamba, C. C. (1977). Lower bounds for the reliability of the total score on a test composed of nonhomogeneous types: I. Algebraic lower bounds. Psychometrika, 42, 567–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, R. W. B., Ferguson, G. A. (1941). Studies on the reliability of tests, Toronto: University of Toronto, Bureau of Educational Research.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M. (1955). Estimating test reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 15, 324–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. (1956). Sampling error due to choice of split in split-half reliability coefficients. Journal of Experimental Education, 24, 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Rajaratnam, N., Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C. (1965). Generalizability of stratified-parallel tests. Psychometrika, 30, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ten Berge, J. M. F., Snijders, T. A. B., Zegers, F. E. (1981). Computational aspects of the greatest lower bound to the reliability and constrained minimum trace factor analysis. Psychometrika, 46, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tryon, R. C. (1957). Reliability and behavior domain validity: Reformulation and historical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 229–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodhouse, B., Jackson, P. W. (1977). Lower bounds for the reliability of the total score on a test composed of nonhomogeneous types: II. A search procedure to locate the greatest lower bound. Psychometrika, 42, 579–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zegers, F. E., & Knol, D. L. (1980, June). Chance capitalization in the greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test. Paper presented at the European meeting of the Psychometric Society, Groningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar