Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-8p85h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-12T13:09:08.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The embodiment of power as upward/downward movement in Chinese-English bilinguals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2024

Huilan Yang Open the ORCID record for Huilan Yang [Opens in a new window]  and
Jeffrey Nick Reid Open the ORCID record for Jeffrey Nick Reid [Opens in a new window]
Huilan Yang*
Affiliation:
Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China
Jeffrey Nick Reid
Affiliation:
University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada
*
Corresponding author: Huilan Yang; Email: yanghuilan@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using an action compatibility task, we investigated whether POWER is embodied in terms of upward and downward movement in two languages (first and dominant language: Chinese; second language: English). Chinese-English bilinguals were asked to quickly and accurately categorize power-related words (e.g., “boss,” “intern”) as “powerful” or “powerless.” The response to indicate that the word was “powerful” required an upward movement in the compatible condition, while the response to indicate “powerless” involved a downward movement. These responses were reversed in the incompatible condition (“powerful”-downward/“powerless”-upward). When the response actions were compatible rather than incompatible, participants were faster to categorize the words. Furthermore, the action compatibility effect was observed in both languages, but surprisingly the action compatibility effect was larger in their L2. The findings support the psychological reality of the “POWER IS UP” conceptual metaphor that is active when participants process language in both their primary and secondary languages.

Keywords

bilingualismpower metaphorupward/downward movement

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , July 2024 , pp. 647 - 665
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In Pecher, D. & Zwaan, R. (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought (pp. 129–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499968.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. K. (1986). The social psychology of Chinese people. In Bond, MH (Eds.), The Psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 213–266). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borghi, A. M., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2022). Abstract concepts: External influences, internal constraints, and methodological issues. Psychological Research, 86(8), 2370–2388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01698-4 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borreggine, K. L., & Kaschak, M. P. (2006). The action–sentence compatibility effect: It’s all in the timing. Cognitive Science, 30(6), 1097–1112. https://doi/abs/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_91 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cieślicka, A. (2006). Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners. Second Language Research, 22(2), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr263oa CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cieślicka, A. B. (2015). Idiom acquisition and processing by second/foreign language learners. In Heredia, RR and Cieślicka, AB (Eds.), Bilingual figurative language processing (pp. 208–244). New York, NY: Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 777–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C., & Jeulink, M. (2011). The flesh and blood of embodied understanding: The source-path-goal schema in animation film. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.1.02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, R. W. Jr (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr (2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giessner, S. R., & Schubert, T. W. (2007). High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders’ power are interrelated. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(3), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196313 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez, J., Barros-Loscertales, A., Pulvermuller, F., Meseguer, V., Sanjuan, A., Belloch, V., & Avila, C. (2006). Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. NeuroImage, 32, 906–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.037 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grady, J. E. (1997). Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermuller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heredia, R. R., & Muñoz, M. E. (2015). Metaphoric reference: A real-time analysis. In Heredia, R. R. & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.), Bilingual figurative language processing (pp. 89–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiefer, M., & Pulvermuller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48, 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiefer, M., Sim, E. J., Herrnberger, B., Grothe, J., & Hoenig, K. (2008). The sound of concepts: Four markers for a link between auditory and conceptual brain systems. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 12224–12230. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3579-08.2008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakens, D., Semin, G. R., & Foroni, F. (2011). Why your highness needs the people. Social Psychology, 42(3), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2006). Conceptual metaphor. In Geeraerts, D. (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 185–238). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lan, C. (2000). A cognitive approach to spatial metaphors in English and Chinese [Doctoral dissertation, Hong Kong Polytechnic University].Google Scholar
Levy, R. (2014). Using R formulae to test for main effects in the presence of higher-order interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.2094. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.2094.pdf Google Scholar
McGlone, M. S. (2007). What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor?. Language & Communication, 27(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlone, M. S. (2011). Hyperbole, homunculi, and hindsight bias: An alternative evaluation of conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.606104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, B. P., Sellbom, M., & Wygant, D. B. (2007). Failing to take the moral high ground: Psychopathy and the vertical representation of morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 757–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, L. W. (1985). Asian power and politics: The cultural dimensions of authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-ints.html Google Scholar
Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, J. N., & Katz, A. (2022). Conceptual metaphors influence memory automatically: Evidence from a divided attention false memory task. Memory & Cognition, 50, 1336–1349. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01322-1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, J. N., & Katz, A. N. (2018). Something false about conceptual metaphors. Metaphor & Symbol, 33(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1407994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M. D., & Fetterman, A. K. (2015). The embodiment of success and failure as forward versus backward movements. PLoS One, 10(2), e0117285. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117285 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, L. (2020). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.5.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2001). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2007). L1 cultural conceptualisations in L2 learning. In Sharifian, F. & Palmer, G. B. (Eds.), Applied cultural linguistics: Implications for second language learning and intercultural communication (pp. 34–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2011). Cultural conceptualizations and language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, X., & Wang, J. (2011). Cultural distance between China and US across GLOBE model and Hofstede model. International Business and Management, 2(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.ibm.1923842820110201.004 Google Scholar
Singmann, H., & Kellen, D. (2019). An introduction to mixed models for experimental psychology. In Spieler, D. & Schumacher, E. (Eds.), New methods in neuroscience and cognitive psychology (pp. 1–39). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429318405-2 Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Nonconscious effects of power on basic approach and avoidance tendencies. Social Cognition, 26(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.1.1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencer-Oatey, H. (1997). Unequal relationships in high and low power distance societies: A comparative study of ibtor-student role relations in Britain and China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(3), 284–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022197283005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, P., & Ye, H. (2015). The spatial size metaphor of power concepts: A perspective from embodied cognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(4), 514–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Türker, E. (2016). The role of L1 conceptual and linguistic knowledge and frequency in the acquisition of L2 metaphorical expressions. Second Language Research, 32(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315593336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, B., Duffy, S. E., & Littlemore, J. (2020). Power, gender, and individual differences in spatial metaphor: The role of perceptual stereotypes and language statistics. Metaphor and Symbol, 35(3), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2020.1794319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H., He, X., Zhao, X., & Zhang, W. (2015). Multiple metaphorical representations of power: Evidence from size and color. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(7), 939–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H., Reid, J. N., Katz, A. N., & Li, D. (2021). The embodiment of power as forward/backward movement in Chinese and English speakers. Metaphor and Symbol, 36(3), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1907185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H., Reid, J. N., & Mei, Y. (2023). Conceptual metaphor activation in Chinese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 26(2), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728922000530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, N., Wang, T., & He, Y. (2016). Spatial subsystem of moral metaphors: A cognitive semantic study. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(4), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1223470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanolie, K., Van Dantzig, S., Boot, I., Wijnen, J., Schubert, T. W., Giessner, S. R., & Pecher, D. (2012). Mighty metaphors: Behavioral and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension. Brain and Cognition, 78(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.006 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed