Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-jnbmb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-25T09:38:53.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WEIGHTED AVERAGE POWER SIMILAR TESTS FOR STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN THE GAUSSIAN LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

Giovanni Forchini
Giovanni Forchini*
Affiliation:
Monash University
*
Address correspondence to Giovanni Forchini, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia; e-mail: Giovanni.Forchini@BusEco.monash.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Average exponential F tests for structural change in a Gaussian linear regression model and modifications thereof maximize a weighted average power that incorporates specific weighting functions to make the resulting test statistics simple. Generalizations of these tests involve the numerical evaluation of (potentially) complicated integrals. In this paper, we suggest a uniform Laplace approximation to evaluate weighted average power test statistics for which a simple closed form does not exist. We also show that a modification of the avg-F test is optimal under a very large class of weighting functions and can be written as a ratio of quadratic forms so that both its p-values and critical values are easy to calculate using numerical algorithms.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 24 , Issue 5 , October 2008 , pp. 1277 - 1290
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, D.W.K., Lee, I., & Ploberger, W. (1996) Optimal changepoint tests for normal linear regression. Journal of Econometrics 70, 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D.W.K. & Ploberger, W. (1994) Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica 62, 1383–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleistein, N. & Handelsman, R.A. (1986) Asymptotic Expansions of Integrals. Dover.Google Scholar
Cox, D.R. & Hinkley, D.V. (1974) Theoretical Statistics. Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bruijn, N.G. (1961) Asymptotic Methods in Analysis. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Dufour, J.-M. & Khalaf, L. (2001) Monte Carlo test methods in econometrics. In Baltagi, B. (ed.), Companion to Theoretical Econometrics, pp. 494–519. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Elliott, G. & Müller, U.K. (2006) Efficient tests for general persistent time variation in regression coefficients. Review of Economic Studies 73, 907–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forchini, G. (2002) Optimal similar tests for structural change for the linear regression model. Econometric Theory 18, 853–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forchini, G. (2005) Weighted Average Power Similar Tests for Structural Change for the Gaussian Linear Regression Model. Discussion paper 20/05, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University.Google Scholar
Hillier, G.H. (1987) Classes of similar regions and their power properties for some econometric testing problems. Econometric Theory 3, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imhof, J.P. (1961) Computing the distribution of quadratic forms in normal variables. Biometrika 48, 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, M.L. & Hillier, G.H. (1985) Locally best invariant tests of the error covariance matrix of the linear regression model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 47, 98–102.Google Scholar
Slater, L.J. (1960) Confluent Hypergeometric Functions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wald, A. (1943) Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 54, 426–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar