No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
How does tiger moth (Erebidae, Arctiinae) functional diversity respond to environmental and spatial variables?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 December 2025
Abstract
Deterministic and stochastic processes are of great importance in influencing the composition of communities. Here, we tested if deterministic and stochastic processes have the same force of influence on functional traits of tiger moth communities. Specifically, we hypothesised that the functional traits of the tribe Arctiini would be more strongly influenced by stochastic processes (associated with spatial variables), given that these moths are primarily diet and habitat generalists within a highly diverse clade. They also exhibit high morphological trait dissimilarity and are capable of occupying a wide range of vegetation habitats. On the other hand, we hypothesised that the functional traits of the tribe Lithosiini would be more influenced by deterministic processes (associated with environmental variables), given that these moths are primarily diet and habitat specialist moths and tend to occur in more specific vegetation types. In agreement with our hypotheses, the functional traits of Arctiini species were better explained by variables related to stochasticity, while the functional traits of Lithosiini were explained by deterministic processes only. Thus, the processes shaping moth distributions across communities may vary according to species’ functional traits and interspecific relationships.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Agosta, SJ and Janzen, DH (2005) Body size distributions of large Costa Rican dry forest moths and the underlying relationship between plant and pollinator morphology. Oikos 108, 183–193.10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13504.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, SSP and Louzada, JNC (2009) Estrutura da comunidade de Scarabaeinae (Scarabaeidae: Coleoptera) em Fitofisionomias do Cerrado e sua Importância para a Conservação. Neotropical Entomology 38, 32–43.10.1590/S1519-566X2009000100003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnan, X, Cerdá, X and Retana, J (2015) Partitioning the impact of environment and spatial structure on alpha and beta components of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity in European ants. PeerJ 3, 1–19.10.7717/peerj.1241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldissera, R, Rodrigues, ENL and Hartz, SM (2012) Metacommunity composition of web-spiders in a fragmented Neotropical forest: relative importance of environmental and spatial effects. Plos One 7, 1–9.10.1371/journal.pone.0048099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, J, Schulze, CH, Linsenmair, KE and Fiedler, K (2002) From forest to farmland: diversity of geometrid moths along two habitat gradients on Borneo. Journal of Tropical Ecology 18, 33–51.10.1017/S026646740200202XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezzerides, A, Yong, TH, Bezzerides, J, Husseini, J, Ladau, J, Eisner, M and Eisner, T (2004) Plant- derived pyrrolizidine alkaloid protects eggs of a moth (Utetheisa ornatrix) against a parasitoid wasp (Trichogramma ostriniae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 9029–9032.10.1073/pnas.0402480101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanchet, FG, Legendre, P and Borcard, D (2008) Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology 899, 2623–2632.10.1890/07-0986.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borcard, D, Legendre, P and Drapeau, P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 733, 1045–1055.10.2307/1940179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borcard, D and Legendre, P (2002) All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecological Modelling 153, 51–68.10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00501-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, MD (2009) Chemical defenses in woolly bears: sequestration and efficacy against predators and parasitoids. In Conner, WE (ed), Tiger Moths and Wolly Bears, Behavior, Ecology and Evolution of the Arctiidae. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 83–102.Google Scholar
Brehm, G (2007) Contrasting patterns of vertical stratification in two moth families in a Costa Rican lowland rain forest. Basic and Applied Ecology 8, 44–54.10.1016/j.baae.2006.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, RA and Tejerina-Garro, FL (2015) Environmental and spatial processes: what controls the functional structure of fish assemblages in tropical rivers and headwater streams? Ecology of Freshwater Fish 24, 317–328.10.1111/eff.12152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cianciaruso, MV, Silva, IA and Batalha, MA (2009) Diversidades filogenética e funcional: novas abordagens para a ecologia de comunidades. Biota Neotropica 9, 93–103.10.1590/S1676-06032009000300008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bie, T, De Meester, L, Brendonck, L, Martens, K, Goddeeries, B, Ercken, D, Hampel, H, Denys, L, Vanhecke, L, Van der Gucht, K, Van Wichelen, J, Vyverman, W and Declerck, SAJ (2012) Body size and dispersal mode as key traits determining metacommunity structure of aquatic organisms. Ecology Letters 15, 740–747.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01794.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dray, S, Legendre, P and Peres-Neto, PR (2006) Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices PCNM. Ecological Modelling 196, 483–493.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavilanez, MM and Stevens, RD (2013) Role of environmental, historical and spatial processes in the structure of Neotropical primate communities: contrasting taxonomic and phylogenetic perspectives. Global Ecology and Biogeography 22, 607–619.10.1111/geb.12011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves-Souza, T, Romero, GQ and Cottenie, K (2014) Metacommunity versus biogeography: a case study of two groups of Neotropical vegetation-dwelling arthropods. Plos One 9, 1–20.10.1371/journal.pone.0115137CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampson, GF (1898) Catalogue of the Lepidoptera Phalaenae in the British Museum. London: Printed by order of the Trustees.10.5962/bhl.title.52217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampson, GF (1900) Catalogue of the Lepidoptera Phalaenae in the British Museum. London: Printed by order of the Trustees.Google Scholar
Hampson, GF (1901) Catalogue of the Lepidoptera Phalaenae in the British Museum. London: Printed by order of the Trustees.Google Scholar
Hampson, GF (1914) Catalogue of the Lepidoptera Phalaenae in the British Museum. London: Printed by order of the Trustees.Google Scholar
Hartmann, T (1999) Chemical ecology of pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Planta 207, 483–495.10.1007/s004250050508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, T (2009) Pyrrolizidine alkaloids: The successful adoption of a plant chemical defense. In Conner, WE (ed), Tiger Moths and Wolly Bears, Behavior, Ecology and Evolution of the Arctiidae. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–82.Google Scholar
Heppner, JB (1991) Faunal regions and the diversity of Lepidoptera. Tropical Lepidoptera 2, 1–85.Google Scholar
Hilt, N and Fiedler, K (2006) Arctiid moth ensembles along a successional gradient in the Ecuadorian montane rain forest zone: how different are subfamilies and tribes? Journal of Biogeography 33, 108–120.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01360.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmeister, J, Hosek, J, Malicek, J, Palice, Z, Syrovatkova, L, Steinova, J and Cernajova, I (2016) Large beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees as ‘lifeboats’for lichen diversity in central European forests. Biodiversity Conservation 25, 1073–1090.10.1007/s10531-016-1106-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, SP (2001) The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keddy, PA (1992) Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 3, 157–164.10.2307/3235676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kembel, SW, Cowan, PD, Helmus, MR, Cornwell, WK, Morlon, H, Ackerly, DD, Blomberg, SP and Webb, CO (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatic Application Notes 26, 1463–1464.Google ScholarPubMed
Kraft, NJB, Valencia, R and Ackerly, DD (2008) Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest. Science 322, 580–582.10.1126/science.1160662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibold, MA, Holyoak, M, Mouquet, N, Amarasekare, P, Chase, JM, Hoopes, MF, Holt, RD, Shurin, JB, Law, R, Tilman, D, Loreau, M and Gonzalez, A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 7, 601–613.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonov, VD (2023) Stochastic and deterministic processes in the establishment of taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity of ecological communities: a review of modern concepts. Russian Journal of Ecology 54, 251–265.10.1134/S1067413623040057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGill, BJ, Enquist, BJ, Weiher, E and Westoby, M (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21, 178–185.10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, C, Cianciaruso, MV, Sgarbi, LF and Ferro, VG (2014) Richness and composition of tiger moths (Erebidae: Arctiinae) in a Neotropical savanna: are heterogeneous habitats richer in species? Natureza & Conservação 12, 138–143.10.1016/j.ncon.2014.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, C, Landeiro, VL and Ferro, VG (2016) Plant species richness as the main driver of moth metacommunities. Ecological Entomology 41, 707–715.10.1111/een.12348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muirhead-Thompson, RC (1991) Trap responses of flying insects. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Myers, N, Mittermeier, RA, Mittermeier, CG, da Fonseca, GAB and Kent, J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858.10.1038/35002501CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira-Filho, AT and Ratter, JA (2002) Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the Cerrado Biome. In Oliveira, PS and Marquis, RJ (eds), The Cerrados of Brazil. Ecology and natural history of a Neotropical savanna. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 91–120.10.7312/oliv12042-007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padial, AA, Ceschin, F, Declerck, SAJ, De Meester, L, Bonecker, CC, Lansac-Tôha, FA, Rodrigues, L, Rodrigues, LC, Train, S, Velho, LFM and Bini, LM (2014) Dispersal ability determines the role of environmental, spatial and temporal drivers of metacommunity structure. Plos One 9, 1–8.10.1371/journal.pone.0111227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pandit, SN, Kolasa, J and Cottenie, K (2009) Contrasts between habitat generalists and specialists: an empirical extension to the basic metacommunity framework. Ecology 908, 2253–2262.10.1890/08-0851.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panzer, R and Schwartz, MW (1998) Effectiveness of a vegetation-based approach to insect conservation. Conservation Biology 12, 693–702.Google Scholar
Pavoine, S and Bonsall, MB (2011) Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach. Biological Reviews 86, 792–812.10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00171.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peres-Neto, PR, Legendre, P, Dray, S and Borcard, D (2006) Variation partitioning of species data matrices: Estimation and comparison fractions. Ecology 87, 2614–2625.10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2614:VPOSDM]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piñas-Rubio, F, Rab-Green, S, Onore, G and Manzano, PI (2000) Mariposas Del Ecuador. Butterflies & moths of Ecuador. Family: Arctiidae, Subfamilias: Arctiinae y Pericopinae. Quito: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador.Google Scholar
Piñas-Rubio, F and Manzano, PI (2003) Mariposas del Ecuador, Arctiidae, Subfamília: Ctenuchinae. Quito: Conpañia de Jesús.Google Scholar
Podani, J and Schmera, D (2006) On dendrogram-based measures of functional diversity. Oikos 115, 179–185.10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.15048.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Ramos-Neto, MB and Pivello, VR (2000) Lightning fires in a Brazilian savanna National Park: rethinking management strategies. Environmental Management 26, 675–684.10.1007/s002670010124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribas, CR, Schoereder, JH, Pic, M and Soares, SM (2003) Tree heterogeneity, resource availability, and larger scale process regulating arboreal ant species richness. Austral Ecology 28, 305–314.10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01290.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, FHG., Silveira, L, Jácomo, ATA, Carmignotto, AP, Bezerra, AMR, Coelho, DC, Garbogini, H, Pagnozzi, J and Hass, A (2002). Composição e caracterização da fauna de mamíferos do Parque Nacional das Emas, Goiás, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 19, 589–600.10.1590/S0101-81752002000200015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satoh, D (2001) A discrete bass model and its parameter estimation. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 441, 1–18.10.15807/jorsj.44.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sattler, T, Borcard, D, Arlettaz, R, Bontadina, F, Legendre, P, Obrist, MK and Moretti, M (2010) Spider, bee, and bird communities in cities are shaped by environmental control and high stochasticity. Ecology 91, 3343–3353.10.1890/09-1810.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, CH, Zaspel, JM, Chialvo, P and Weller, S (2014) A preliminary molecular phylogenetic assessment of the lichen moths (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae: Lithosiini) with comments on palatability and chemical Sequestration. Systematic Entomology 39, 286–303.10.1111/syen.12047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sha, A, Roy, S, Tiwari, PK, Chattopadhyay, J (2024) Dynamics of a generalist predator–prey system with harvesting and hunting cooperation in deterministic/stochastic environment. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences 47, 5916–5938.10.1002/mma.9897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siefert, A, Ravenscroft, C, Weiser, MD and Swenson, NG (2013) Functional beta-diversity patterns reveal deterministic community assembly processes in eastern North American trees. Global Ecology and Biogeography 22, 682–691.10.1111/geb.12030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silveira-Neto, S and Silveira, AC (1969) Armadilha luminosa modelo “Luiz de Queiroz”. O Solo 61, 19–21.Google Scholar
Simmons, R (2009) Adaptative coloration and mimicry. In Conner, WE (ed), Tiger Moths and Wolly Bears, Behavior, Ecology and Evolution of the Arctiidae. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 115–126.Google Scholar
Singer, MS and Bernays, EA (2009) Specialized generalists: behavioral and evolutionary ecology of polyphagous wooly bear caterpillars. In Conner, WE (ed), Tiger Moths and Wolly Bears, Behavior, Ecology and Evolution of the Arctiidae. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 103–114.Google Scholar
Siqueira, T, Bini, LM, Roque, FO, Couceiro, SRM, Trivinho-Strixino, S and Cottenie, K (2012) Common and rare species respond to similar niche processes in macroinvertebrate metacommunities. Ecography 35, 183–192.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06875.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soininen, J, Korhonen, JJ and Luoto, M (2013) Stochastic species distributions are driven by organism size. Ecology 94, 660–670.10.1890/12-0777.1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soininen, J (2014) A quantitative analysis of species sorting across organisms and ecosystems. Ecology 95, 3284–3292.10.1890/13-2228.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soininen, J (2016) Spatial structure in ecological communities – a quantitative analysis. Oikos 125, 160–166.10.1111/oik.02241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenson, NG, Anglada-Cordero, P and Barone, JA (2011) Deterministic tropical tree community turnover: evidence from patterns of functional beta diversity along an elevational gradient. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 278, 877–884.Google ScholarPubMed
Swenson, NG, Erickson, DL, Mi, X, Bourg, NA, Forero-Montaña, J, Ge, X, Howe, R, Lake, JK, Liu, X, Ma, K, Pei, N, Thompson, J, Uriarte, M, Wolf, A, Wright, SJ, Ye, W, Zhang, J, Zimmerman, JK and Kress, WJ (2012) Phylogenetic and functional alpha and beta diversity in temperate and tropical tree communities. Ecology 93, 112–125.Google Scholar
Usher, MB and Keiller, SWJ (1998) The macrolepidoptera of farm woodlands: determinants of diversity and community structure. Biodiversity and Conservation 7, 725–748.10.1023/A:1008836302193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Violle, C, Navas, ML, Vile, D, Kazakou, E, Fortunel, C, Hummel, I and Garnier, E (2007) Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116, 882–892.10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15559.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, RJ, Peres-Neto, PR and Beisner, BE (2013) Using functional traits to investigate the determinants of crustacean zooplankton community structure. Oikos 122, 1700–1709.10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00039.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, DL (2009) The immature stages: structure, function, behavior, and ecology. In Conner, WE (ed), Tiger Moths and Wolly Bears, Behavior, Ecology and Evolution of the Arctiidae. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–53.Google Scholar
Watson, A and Goodger, DT (1986) Catalogue of the Neotropical tiger-moths. Occasional Papers on Systematic Entomology 1, 1–70.Google Scholar
Webb, CO, Ackerly, DD, McPeek, MA and Donoghue, MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33, 475–505.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiher, E, Clarke, GDP and Keddy, PA (1998) Community assembly rules, morphological dispersion, and the coexistence of plant species. Oikos 81, 309–22.10.2307/3547051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, SJ, Jacobson, N. and Conner, WE (1999) The evolution of chemical defences and mating systems in tiger moths (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68, 557–578.10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01188.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, S, DaCosta, M, Simmons, R, Dittmar, K and Whiting, M (2009) Evolution and taxonomic confusion in Arctiidae. In Conner, WE (ed), Tiger Moths and Wolly Bears, Behavior, Ecology and Evolution of the Arctiidae. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
Winegardner, AK, Jones, BK, Ng, ISY, Siqueira, T and Cottenie, K (2012) The terminology of metacommunity ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 275, 253–254.10.1016/j.tree.2012.01.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahiri, R, Holloway, JD, Kitching, IJ, Lafontaine, D, Mutanen, M and Whalberg, N (2012) Molecular phylogenetics of Erebidae (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea). Systematic Entomology 37, 102–124.10.1111/j.1365-3113.2011.00607.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaspel, JM, Weller, SJ, Wardwell, CT, Zahiri, R and Whalberg, N (2014) Phylogeny and Evolution of pharmacophagy in tiger moths (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae). Plos One 9, 1–10.10.1371/journal.pone.0101975CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zava, PC and Cianciaruso, MV (2014) Can we use plant traits and soil characteristics to predict leaf damage in savanna woody species? Plant Ecology 215, 625–637.10.1007/s11258-014-0328-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno et al. supplementary material
Moreno et al. supplementary material
File
46.4 KB