Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-xh428 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T09:17:54.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning to use prepositions: a case study*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Michael Tomasello
Michael Tomasello*
Affiliation:
Emory University
*
Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current study documented one child's earliest use of prepositions during her second year of life. The spatial oppositions up-down, on-off, in—out and over—under were first to be learned. These words were all used initially in non-prepositional senses (mostly as holophrastic, verb-like requests for activities) prior to prepositional usage. They were seldom omitted or misused. The prepositions with, by, to, for, at and of were learned later. Four of these were used to express at least two distinct case relationships, and some case relationships (instrumental and dative) were indicated by more than one of these words. These later learned prepositions were not used by adults or learned by the child as holophrases, but rather they were acquired as distinct lexical items by means of analytic learning strategies that employed some form of ‘extraction’ from adult phrases. These words were omitted and misused much more often than the spatial oppositions. Differences in the acquisition pattern of these two groups of prepositions were attributed to linguistic rather than to cognitive factors.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , February 1987 , pp. 79 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

The author would like to thank Jeff Gilden and Sharon Garson for their help with data collation. Also, thanks to Sara Mannle, Jeff Farrar, and Ann Kruger for helpful comments on the manuscript, and to Kim Wallen for help with the figure.

References

REFERENCES

Bennett, D. C. (1975) Spatial and temporal uses of English prepositions. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Blewitt, P. (1982) Word meaning acquisition in young children: a review of theory and research. In Reese, H. (ed.), Advances in child development and behaviour. Vol. 17. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Tackeff, J. & Lahey, M. (1984) Learning to in complement constructions. Journal of Child Language 11. 391–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. (1973) A first language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (in press) Acquisition of Romance, with special reference to French. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dromi, E. (1979) More on the acquisition of locative prepositions: an analysis of Hebrew data. Journal of Child Language 6. 547–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durkin, K. (1981) Aspects of late language acquisition: school children's use and comprehension of prepositions. First Language 2. 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, H. (1975) On the child's acquisition of semantic structure underlying the wordfield of prepositions. Language and Speech 8. 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J. & Slobin, D. (1979) The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. Journal of Child Language 6. 529–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leopold, W. (1949) Speech development of a bilingual child. Vol. 3. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973) Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 38. No 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. E. (1982) Theories of the child's acquisition of syntax. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 345. 45–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. E., & Bonvillian, J. (1973) Concepts and words in the 2-year-old: acquisition of concept names under controlled conditions. Cognition 2. 435–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. (1983) The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1967) The child's conception of space. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. & Terrel, T. (1983) The role of input frequency in lexical acquisition. Journal of Child Language 10. 57–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slobin, D. I. (1973) Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1980) A conceptual analysis of early lexical development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Farrar, J. (1984) Cognitive bases of early language: object permanence and relational words. Journal of Child Language 11, 477–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Farrar, J. (in press) Joint attention and early language. Child Development.Google Scholar
von Glasersfeld, E. (1965) An approach to the semantics of prepositions. Paper presented to the Association for Machine Translation and Computational Linguistics, Las Vegas, Nevada.Google Scholar
Vorster, J. (1984) The first prepositions in Afrikaans: order and semantic distinctions. Paper presented to the Third International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Warriner, J. (1951) Handbook of English. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.Google Scholar