Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-76mfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T23:58:51.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Actual Tasks of Stress Analysis by Diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Viktor Hauk
Viktor Hauk*
Affiliation:
Institut für Werkstoffkunde, Rheinisch Westfälische Technische Hochschule, D-52056 AACHEN, Germany
Get access

Extract

Studying the literature, drafts of papers, and proposals of test projects, some ideas on new tasks emerge. Not all thougths may be progressive to the experts. There may exist further problems to be solved in the future. Not mentioning them does not mean they are unimportant, but it is hoped the following may stimulate new methods, new tests, new results, new assessment of residual stresses (RS) to the benefit of this scientific branch.

There exists a tremendous volume of literature/\/.In referring to previous papers and results, the procedure of a great old physicist should be followed: mention both the first idea and a comprehensive treatment of the topic.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 39: Forty-Fourth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, July 31 - August 4, 1995 , 1995 , pp. 181 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Hauk, J. : Schrifttum über Spannungsermittlung mit Röntgen- und Neutronenstrahlen 1991 und 1992. HTM 49 (1994), 406-419. Previous surveys are cited there.Google Scholar
2. Waldhauser, W., Mitterer, C.: Aufbau und Elektronenemission von PVD-Schichten auf Hexaborid-Basis. Paper presented at DGM-Hauptversammlung, 6-9June 1995, Bochum, Germany.Google Scholar
3. Baron, H. U., Bayer, E., Steinhauser, L., Bradaczek, H., Wasiewicz, E.: A 13-axis goniometer for diffraction investigations on large samples. Europ. J. Non-Destructive Testing 3 (1993), 17-23.Google Scholar
4. Kreft, U., Hoffmann, F., Hirsch, T., Mayr, P.: Eigenspannungsentstehung während des Gasnitrierens. HTM 50 (1995), 169-175. Investigation of the formation of Residual Stress in the compound layer during gasnitriding. In: Residual Stresses, edited by Hauk, V., Hougardy, H. P., Macherauch, E., Tietz, H-D., DGM Informationsgesellschaft Verlag, Oberursel, 1993, 115-122.Google Scholar
5. Ruppersberg, H., Detemple, I.: Evaluation of the stress field in a ground steel plate from energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction experiments. Mat. Sci. Engg. A 161 (1993), 41-44.Google Scholar
6. Behnken, Chauhan, H. D., Hauk, V.: Ermittlung der Spannungen in polymeren Werkstoffen - Gitterdehnungen, Makro- und Mikro- Eigenspannungen in einem Werkstoffverbund Polypropylen/Al-Pulver. Mat. -Wiss. u. Werkstofftech. 22 (1991), 321-331.Google Scholar
7. Behnken, H., Hauk, V.: Die Bestimmung der Mikro-Eigenspannungen und ihre Berücksichtigung bei der röntgenographischen Ermittlung der Makro-Eigenspannungen in mehrphasigen Materialien, In: Werkstoffkunde, Beiträge zu den Grundlagen und zur interdisziplinären Anwendung. Hrsgg. von P. Mayr, Vöhringer, O., Wohlfahrt, H.. DGM Infonnationsgesellschaft Verlag, Oberursel, 1991, 141-150.Google Scholar
7a. Hauk, V., Oudelhoven, R., Vaessen, G.: Über die Art der Eigenspannungen nach Schleifen. HTM 36 (1981), 258-261.Google Scholar
Hauk, V. : Eigenspannungen. Ihre Bedeutung für Wissenschaft und Technik. In: Eigenspannungen, edited by Macherauch, E., Hauk, V.. DGM, Oberursel 1 (1983), 9-48.Google Scholar
Noyan, I. C. : Equilibrium Conditions of the Average Stresses Measured by X-Rays. Metall. Trans. A 14A(1983) 1907-1914.Google Scholar
8. Behnken, H., Hauk, V.: Micro- and macrostresses in friction welded steel rods. In: Proc. of the Fourth International Conference on Residual Stresses, ICRS4, Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT, USA 1994, 382-391.Google Scholar
9. Behnken, H., Hauk, V.: On the influence of microresidual stresses during cyclic loading. In: Residual Stresses, edited by Hauk, V., Hougardy, H. P., Macherauch, E., Tietz, H-D., DGM Informationsgesellschaft Verlag, Oberursel 1993, 733–742.Google Scholar
10. Hauk, V., Nikolin, H. J., Pintschovius, L.: Evaluation of deformation residual stresses caused by uniaxial plastic strain of ferritic and ferritic-austenitic steels. Z. |Metallkd. 81 (1990), 556–569.Google Scholar
11. Hauk, V., Krüger, B.: Eigenspannungsprofile oberflächenverformter TiA16V4-Proben. HTM 50 (1995), 188-192.Google Scholar
12. Hauk, V. : Die Bestimmung der Spannungskomponente in Dickenrichtung und der Gitterkonstante des spannungsfreien Zustandes. HTM 46 (1991), 52-59.Google Scholar
13. Detemple, I., Ruppersberg, H.: Evaluation of σ33 from diffraction experiments performed with synchrotron radiation in the Ω-and Ψ- goniometries. Adv. X-Ray Anal. 37 (1994).Google Scholar
14. Chauhan, D., Hauk, V.: Spannungen in verstärkten Polymer-Werksfoffen. VDI Berichte Nr. 1151 (1995), 533–536.Google Scholar
15. Eigenmann, B., Macherauch, E.: Determination of grinding residual stress states in surface layers of engineering ceramics using synchrotron X-rays. Z. Metallkd. 86 (1995), 84–90.Google Scholar
16. Genzel, Ch. : Formalism for the evaluation of strongly non-linear stress fields by X-ray diffraction performed in the scattering vector mode. phys. stat. sol. 146 (1994), 629–637.Google Scholar
17. Hauk, V., Oudelhoven, R.: Eigenspannungsanalyse an kaltgewalztem Nickel. Z. Metallkd. 79 (1988), 41–49.Google Scholar
Behnken, H., Hauk, V.: The evaluation of residual stresses in textured materials by X- and neutron rays. In; Residual Stresses III, edited by Fujiwara, H., Abe, T., K, Tanaka, Elsevier Applied Science, London and New York, 2 (1992), 899-906. Google Scholar
18. Ruppersberg, H., Detemple, I., Krier, J.: Evaluation of strongly non-linear surface-stress fields σxx(z) and σyy(z) from diffraction experiments, phys. stat. sol. (a) 116(1989), 681-687.Google Scholar
19. Stickforth, J. : Über den Zusammenhang zwischen röntgenographischer Gitterdehnung und makroskopischen elastischen Spannungen. Techn. Mitt. Krupp Forsch. Ber. 24 (1966), 89–102.Google Scholar
20. Greenough, G. B. : Residual strains in plastically deformed metals. Nature 160 (1947), 258-260. Residual strains in plastically deformed steels. Nature 166 (1950), 509–510.Google Scholar
21. Kappler, E., Reimer, L.: Röntgenographische Untersuchungen liber Eigenspannungen in plastisch gedehntem Eisen. Naturwiss. 40 (1953), 360.Google Scholar
22. Hauk, V. : Röntgenographische Gitterkonstantenmessungen an plastisch verformten Stahlproben. Naturwiss. 40 (1953), 507–508.Google Scholar
23. Van Acker, K Van Houtte, P., Aernoudt, E.: Determination of residual stresses in heavily cold deformed steel. In: Proc. of the Fourth International Conference on Residual Stresses, ICRS4, Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT, USA 1994, 402–409.Google Scholar
24. Hauk, V., Heil, W., Stuitje, P. J. T.: Eigenspannungen in Oberflächenschichten nach Schleifen von Cu-Ag und Cu-Fe- Sinterwerkstoffen sowie von Cu, Ag, Fe und austenitischem Stahl. Z. Metallkd. 76 (1985), 640–648.Google Scholar
25. Hutchings, M. T., Krawitz, A. D. (Ed. ): Measurement of Residual and Applied Stress Using Neutron Diffraction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/ Boston/ London 1992.Google Scholar
26. Hougardy, Schultchen, H. P. E., Kamp, H. I., Tacke, G., Freiburg, A.: Calculation of stresses in a 970 mm diameter forging, comparison with measurements. In: International Conference on Residual Stresses, ICRS2, edited by Beck, G., Denis, S., Simon, A.. Elsevier Applied Science, London and New York 1989, 479–484.Google Scholar
27. Ceretti, M.C. |Braham, Lebrun, J. L., Bonnafe, J. P., Perrin, M., Lodini, A.: Residual stress analysis by neutron and X-ray diffraction applied to the study of two phases materials: metal matrix composites. In: Proc, of the Fourth International Conference on Residual Stresses, ICRS4, Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT, USA 1994, 32- 39.Google Scholar
28. Hauk, V., Kockelmann, H.: Eigenspannungszustand der Lauffläche einer Eisenbahnschiene. HTM 49 (1994), 340-352.Google Scholar