No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Anglican ‘Establishment’ Reactions to ‘POP’ Church Music in England, 1956–C.1990
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 March 2016
Extract
The use of popular styles of music in the Church has often proved contentious, and perhaps particularly so in the later twentieth century. Anecdotal evidence abounds of the debate provoked in churches by the introduction of new ‘happy-clappy’ pop-influenced styles, and the supposed wholesale discarding of a glorious heritage of hymnody. In addition, a great deal of literature has appeared elaborating on the inappropriateness of such music. Welcoming a historical study of hymnody in 1996, John Habgood lamented the displacement of traditional hymn singing by ‘trivial and repetitive choruses’. Lionel Dakers, retired Director of the Royal School of Church Music, also saw choruses and worship songs as ‘in many instances little more than trite phrases repeated ad nauseam, often with accompanying body movements’. This paper investigates the reactions of the musical and ecclesiastical establishments to the use of popular music in public worship in the Church of England from 1956 to c. 1990. The period began with a new wave of experimentation epitomized by Geoffrey Beaumont’s Folk Mass and the controversy surrounding it, and ended in the early 1990s, by which time the pop-influenced worship music of the renewal movement had become firmly established in some sections of the Church, with its own figure-heads and momentum.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2006
References
1 For other examples from the English context, see Obelkevich, Jim, ‘Music and Religion in the Nineteenth Century’, in Obelkevich, Jim, Roper, Lyndal and Samuel, Raphael, eds, Disciplines of Faith: Studies in Religion, Politics and Patriarchy (London, 1987), 550–65.Google Scholar
2 Foreword to Barnby, Bertram L., In Concert Sing – Concerning Hymns and their Usage (Norwich, 1996), vii.Google Scholar
3 Dakers, Lionel, ‘Church Music in the Twentieth Century – A Rise and Fall?’, in Hale, P. R., ed., IAO [Incorporated Association of Organists] Millennium Book (2000), 149–64, 153.Google Scholar
4 For a brief history, see: Ward, Pete, Growing Up Evangelical: Youth Work and the Making of a Sub-Culture (London, 1996), 80–140.Google Scholar
5 See Street, John, ‘Shock Waves: the Authoritative Response to Popular Music’, in Strinati, Dominic and Wagg, Stephen, eds, Come on Down? Popular Media Culture in Post-War Britain (London and New York, 1992), 302–24 Google Scholar; Cloonan, Martin, Banned! Censorship of Popular Music in Britain: 1967–92 (Aldershot, 1996).Google Scholar
6 See, for example: Graham, Ysenda Maxtone, The Church Hesitant: a Portrait of the Church of England Today (London, 1993), 213–39.Google Scholar
7 Routley, Erik, Twentieth-Century Church Music (London, 1964), 13–19 Google Scholar; Davies, Horton, Worship and Theology in England, Book III: The Ecumenical Century, 1900 to the Present (Cambridge, 1996 edn), 102–7.Google Scholar
8 Marwick, Arthur, The Sixties: Cultural Revolution in Britain, France, Italy and the United States, c.1958-c. 1974(Oxford, 1998), 55–80.Google Scholar
9 Such as Vaughan Williams’s treatment of folk songs in The English Hymnal (1906).
10 See for example Chambers, Iain, Urban Rhythms: Pop Music and Popular Culture (Basingstoke, 1985), 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Shuker, Roy, Understanding Popular Music (2nd edn, London, 2001), x Google Scholar. See also Adorno’s, Theodor W. influential (though contentious) work ‘On Popular Music’ (first published in 1941), repr. in Frith, Simon and Godwin, Andrew, eds, On Record: Rock, Pop and the Written Word (London and New York, 1990), 301–14.Google Scholar
12 See for example Connell, John and Gibson, Chris, Sound Tracks: Popular Music, Identity and Place (London, 2003), 4–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Temperley, Nicholas, The Music of the English Parish Church, 2 vols (Cambridge, 1979), 1: 341–2.Google Scholar
14 The first of several major collections was published as: Songs of Fellowship Book 1 (1st edn, Eastbourne, 1981). For hymns and songs in the evangelical tradition from Youth Praise to Songs of Fellowship, see Ward, Growing Up Evangelical, 80–140.
15 Shuker, , Understanding Popular Music, 5.Google Scholar
16 Douglas, Mary, Purity and Danger: an Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (London, 1966), 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Quoted in Greenhouse Allt, W., ‘The Presidential Address’, Quarterly Record of the Incorporated Association of Organists 43 (1957), 3–6, 5.Google Scholar
18 Ibid., 3–6, 5.
19 Ibid.
20 Ibid., 6, 3 and 5.
21 Cleall, Charles, Music and Holiness (London, 1964), 44–5.Google Scholar
22 Routley, Erik, Is Jazz Music Christian? (London, 1964), 3.Google Scholar
23 Ibid., 10.
24 Letter of Charles Cleall to Church News, January 1963.
25 Armstrong, Thomas, ‘Presidential Address’, Quarterly Record of the IAO 44 (1958), 3–5, 4 and 5.Google Scholar
26 Hewison, Robert, In Anger: Culture in the Cold War, 1945–60 (London, 1981), 177–81.Google Scholar
27 Appleford, Patrick, ‘Music in Worship and Mission Services’, Theology 63 (1960), 329–33, 330.Google Scholar
28 Ibid.
29 Leader, ‘From Minerva House’, Musical Opinion 963 (1957), 149–51.Google Scholar
30 Music in Church: a Report of the Committee Appointed in 1948 by the Archbishops of Canter bury and York (1st edn, London, 1957; revised edn, 1960), 6.
31 On the IAO conference at Newcastle, see the IAO Quarterly Record 45 (1959), 5.
32 Appleford, Patrick, ‘Music in Worship and Mission Services’, Theology 63 (1960), 329–33, 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Keys, Ivor, ‘Church Music – Change or Decay’, English Church Music (1974), 7–10, 8 Google Scholar. See also Allt, ‘Presidential Address’, 6.
34 Wicks, Allan, ‘Towards the Relevant – in Church Music’, Modern Churchman 8 (1964-5), 80–3, 83 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. This paper was part of a conference of the same year on ‘Symbols for the Sixties’, which included papers on church architecture, liturgy and the new Coventry Cathedral.
35 Rhys, Stephen and Palmer, King, The ABC of Church Music (London, 1967), 63 Google Scholar. Rhys was a Professor at the Royal Academy and sometime assistant chorusmaster to the Philharmonia Chorus. Palmer was a composer, writer and conductor, who had previously worked with the BBC Light Orchestra.
36 Ibid., 29.
37 Church News, October 1964.
38 Apparently meaning here any music used by ‘folk’.
39 Chappell, Paul, Music and Worship in the Anglican Church (London, 1968), 111, 118–19.Google Scholar
40 Rees, Robin L. D., Weary and Ill-at-Ease: a Survey of Clergy and Organists (Leominster, 1993), 13.Google Scholar
41 Cuming, Geoffrey, ‘Liturgical Change in the Church of England and the Roman Catholic Church’, in Davies, Rupert, ed., The Testing of the Churches, 1932–1982 (London, 1982), 119–31.Google Scholar
42 Webster, Peter and Jones, Ian, ‘New Music and the “Evangelical Style” in the Church of England, c.1958-1991’, in Holmes, Steve and Smith, Mark, eds, British Evangelical Identities (forthcoming, Paternoster Press, Carlisle, 2006).Google Scholar
43 For this, see Hastings, Adrian, A History of English Christianity, 1920–1990 (3rd edn, London, 1991), 580–1 Google Scholar; Davie, Grace, Religion in Britain since 1945 (Oxford, 1994), 33.Google Scholar
44 Hastings, Adrian, ‘All Change: the Presence of the Past in British Christianity’, in Wilmer, Haddon, ed., 20/20 Visions: the Futures of Christianity in Britain (London, 1992), 13–29, 20 Google Scholar; Davie, , Religion in Britain, 36.Google Scholar
45 The Sign, ‘Signet’ column, January 1971.
46 Dakers, Lionel, Places where they Sing, Memoirs of a Church Musician (Norwich, 1995).Google Scholar
47 Dakers, Lionel, Church Music at the Crossroads (London, 1970), 129–33.Google Scholar
48 Dakers, , Places where they Sing, 207.Google Scholar
49 Ibid.
50 Ibid., 206–7.
51 Ibid., 224–9.
52 Collins, Tony, ‘Blockbuster Tales and Gospel Songs’, Church Times, 1 March 1991, 8.Google Scholar
53 On this relationship, see Dakers, Lionel, A Handbook of Parish Music (Oxford, 1982), 46–87.Google Scholar