Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-9nbrm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T12:53:51.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Slavery and the Law: A Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2011

Extract

I have come to learn that unless one does it in unabashedly critical terms, including “slavery” and “Tannenbaum” in the same sentence is an intellectual exercise fraught with perils. The sole mention of Tannenbaum elicits images of benevolent Spanish and Portuguese masters in contrast to cruel Anglo-Saxon slaveowners, or of rigid dichotomies between racist North America and racially harmonious Latin America. These images clearly influence the comments of my critics, even though they have limited relevance for the central arguments of my article.

Information

Type
Forum: Response
Copyright
Copyright © the American Society for Legal History, Inc. 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable