Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-lcgwf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T10:57:14.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contested Terrains and Regime Politics: Thinking about America's Trial Courts and Institutional Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Roy B. Flemming
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Institutional change in America's trial courts is poorly understood. Herbert Jacob in his 1982 presidential address to the Law and Society Association recommended that future research might consider intensive studies of single courts over time to trace the causal links between the courts and sociopolitical events outside the courtrooms. This essay explores Jacob's recommendation but ultimately takes a different tack. Instead of conducting natural histories of particular trial courts, this essay speculates that trial courts can be viewed as contested terrains made up of various sites. Proponents of particular ideas, interests, and institutions struggle to impose their policy preferences on these sites. These disputes, which wax and wane over time, constitute the regime politics that shape the probabilities of who wins in America's trial courts. The outlines of this perspective are sketched using the political science literature on agenda politics and on how policy ideas become institutionalized. Illustrations of this perspective are drawn from studies of civil and criminal court reforms.

Information

Type
Symposium: Special Issue in Honor of Herbert Jacob
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , Fall 1998 , pp. 941 - 965
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arthur, W. Brian 1988. Self-Reinforcing Mechanisms in Economics. In The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, ed. Anderson, Philip W., Arrow, Kenneth J., and Pines, David. Redwood City, Calif.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D. 1993. Agendas and Instability m American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Talbert, Jeffrey C. 1995. Interest Groups and Political Change. In The New American Politics: Reflections on Political Change and the Clinton Administration, ed, Jones, Bryan D., 93–108. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Berk, Richard A., Brackman, Harold, and Lesser, Selma. 1977. A Measure of Justice: An Empirical Study of Changes in the California Penal Code, 1955–1971 New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bottomley, Keith, and Coleman, Clive. 1984. Law and Order: Crime Problem, Moral Panic, or Penal Crisis? In Law and Order and Eritish Politics, ed. Norton, Philip. Brookfield, Vt: Gower.Google Scholar
Cobb, Roger W., and Ross, Marc Howard. 1997. Cultural Strategies of Agenda Denial: Avoidance, Attack, and Redefinition. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, Stephen, and Martin, Joanne. 1995. Cultural and the Politics of Reform. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1972. Up and Down with Ecology–the Issue Attention Cycle. Public Interest 28:38–50.Google Scholar
Dubois, Philip L. 1982. The Politics of Judicial Reform. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore, and Henderson, James A. 1992. Inside the Quiet Revolution in Products Liability. UCLA Law Review 39:731–810.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Kobylka, Joseph F. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. 1983. Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fleming, John G. 1988. The American Tort Process. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, Marvin E. 1972. Criminal Sentences: Law without Order. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974- Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law and Society Review 9:95–160.Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph R. 1981. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haines, Herbert H. 1996. Against Capital Punishment: The Anti-Death Penalty Movement in America, 1972–1994. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, Anne, Jacob, Herbert, and Lineberry, Robert L., eds. 1983. Crime in City Politics. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Henderson, James A., and Eisenberg, Theodore. 1990. The Quiet Revolution in Products Liability: An Empirical Study of Legal Change. UCLA Law Review 37:479–553.Google Scholar
Heydebrand, Wolf, and Seron, Carroll. 1990. Rationalizing Justice: The Political Economy of Federal District Courts. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, Herbert. 1983. Presidential Address: Trial Courts in the United States: The Travails of Exploration. Law and Society Review 17:407–24.Google Scholar
Jacob, Herbert. 1984. The Frustration of Policy: Responses to Crime by American Cities. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Jacob, Herbert. 1988. Silent Revolution: The Transformation of Divorce Law in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. 1994. Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Karmen, Andrew. 1996. Crime Victims: An Introduction to Victimology. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What When and How. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Wayne V., and Cates, Cynthia L. 1997. Judicial Entrepreneurship: The Role of the Judge in the Marketplace of Ideas. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Mather, Lynn. 1995. The Fired Football Coach (or, How Trial Courts Make Policy). In Contemplating Courts, ed. Epstein, Lee, 170–202. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
National Safety Council. 1997. Accident Facts. Chicago: National Safety Council.Google Scholar
Powell, Lee, ed. 1980. Court Reform in Seven States. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Priest, George L. 1985. The Invention of Enterprise Liability: A Critical History of the Intellectual Foundations of Modern Tort Law. Journal of Legal Studies 14:461–527.Google Scholar
Reeves, Jimmie L., and Campbell, Richard. 1994. Cracked Coverage: Television News, the Anti-Cocaine Crusade, and the Reagan Legacy. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, H. Laurence 1992. Confronting Drunk Driving: Social Policy for Saving Lives. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. 1993. Policy Change over a Decade or More. In Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith 1993, 13–39.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A., and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., eds. 1993. Policy Change and Leaning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A., Olson, Toska, and Pershing, Jana. 1994. Sexual Violence, Victim Advocacy, and Republican Criminology: Washington State's Community Protection Act. Law and Society Review 28:729–64.Google Scholar
Slind-Flor, Victoria. 1995. Eliminating Jury Trial for Patents OK'd. National Law Journal, 24 April.Google Scholar
Stefancic, Jean, and Delgado, Richard. 1996. No Mercy: How Conservative Think Tanks and Foundations Changed America's Social Agenda. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Stith, Kate, and Koh, Steve Y. 1993. The Politics of Sentencing Reform: The Legislative History of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Wake Forest Law Review 28:223–90.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1983. The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America. American Political Science Review 77:390–406.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward 1980. Tort Law in America: An Intellectual History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yeazell, Stephen C. 1987. From Medieval Group Litigation to the Modern Class Action. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar