Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-5ngxj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T06:47:28.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Preoperative Skin Disinfection on Preventing lntraoperative Wound Contamination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Richard A. Garibaldi ,
Deborah Skolnick ,
Trudy Lerer ,
Andrea Poirot ,
Jeffrey Graham ,
Edward Krisuinas  and
Robert Lyons
Richard A. Garibaldi*
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington Connecticut and St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut
Deborah Skolnick
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington Connecticut and St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut
Trudy Lerer
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington Connecticut and St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut
Andrea Poirot
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington Connecticut and St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut
Jeffrey Graham
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington Connecticut and St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut
Edward Krisuinas
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington Connecticut and St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut
Robert Lyons
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington Connecticut and St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut
*
Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06032
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The efficacy of total body showering and incision site scrub with disinfectant agents was evaluated in a randomized, prospective study of 575 patients undergoing selected surgical procedures. Patients who showered twice with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate had lower mean colony counts of skin bacteria at the surgical incision site in the operating room prior to the final scrub than patients who showered twice with povidone-iodine solution or medicated bar soap. Patients in the chlor-hexidine group had no growth on 43% of the incision site skin cultures compared with 16% in the povidone-iodine group and 6% in the soap and water group. Patients who showered and who were scrubbed with chlorhexidine also had lower rates of intraoperative wound contamination. Bacteria were recovered from the wounds of 4% of patients using this regimen compared with 9% for patients who used povidone-iodine and 15% for patients who showered with medicated soap and water and were scrubbed with povidone-iodine. We noted no difference in surgery-specific infection rates among patients in the three treatment groups; however, our sample sizes were too small to evaluate this outcome parameter adequately.

These data suggest that preoperative showering and scrubbing with chlorhexidine is an effective regimen to reduce extrinsic intraoperative contamination of the surgical wound from skin bacteria. The efficacy of this regimen to prevent postoperative wound infection needs to be evaluated in a well-designed, carefully controlled prospective trial with adequate numbers of patients to achieve statistically valid conclusions.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , March 1988 , pp. 109 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Cruse, P: Wound infection surveillance. Rev Infect Dis 1981; 3:734–737.Google Scholar
2. CDC guidelines for the prevention and control of nosocomial infections. Guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections. 1985. Am J Infect Control 1986: 14:71–80.Google Scholar
3. Olson, M, O'Connor, M, Schwartz, ML: Surgical wound infections. A 5-year prospective study of 20,193 wounds at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center. Ann Surg 1984; 199:253–259.Google Scholar
4. Howe, CW, Marston, AT: A study on sources of postoperative staphylococcal infection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1902; 158:260–275.Google Scholar
5. Burke, JF: Identification of the sources of staphylococci contaminating surgical wound during operation. Ann Surg 1963; 158:898–904.Google Scholar
6. National Aeademy of Sciences—National Research Council Division of Medical Sciences, Ad Hoc Committee of the Committee on Trauma: Postoperative wound infectious: The influence of ultraviolet irradiation of the operating room and of various other factors. Ann Surg 1964; 160 (suppl):9–192.Google Scholar
7. Hasselgren, P, Holm, J: Sources and routes in postoperative wound infections. Acta Chir Stand 1981; 147:99–103.Google Scholar
8. Berkelman, RL, Martin, D, Graham, DR. et al; Streptococcal wound infections caused by a vaginal carrier. JAMA 1982; 247:2680–2682.Google Scholar
9. Lister, J: Classies in infectious diseases. On the antiseptic principle of the practice of surgery. Rev Infect Dis 1987: 9:421–426.Google Scholar
10. Williamson, P, Kligman, AM: A new method for the quantitative investigation of cutaneous bacteria. J Invest Dermatol 1965; 45:498–503.Google Scholar
11. Craythorn, J, Garibaldi, RA, Barbour, AG, et al: Membrane filter contact technique for bacteriological sampling of moist surfaces. J Clin Microbiol 1980: 12:250–255.Google Scholar
12. Skolnick, D, Garibaldi, R, Graham, J, et al: The changing epidemiology of postoperative wound infection. APIC 1986, Las Vegas, Nevada, 05 1986.Google Scholar
13. Owens, WD, Felts, JA, Spitznagel, EL: ASA physical status classifications: A study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978; 49:239–243.Google Scholar
14. McCabe, WR, Jackson, GG: Gram-negative bacteremia. I. Ediology and ecology. Arch Intern Med 1962: 110:847–855.Google Scholar
15. Lowbury, EJL, Lilly, HA: The use of 4% chlorhexidine detergent solution (Hibiscrub) and other methods of skin disinfection. Br Med J 1973; 2:510–515.Google Scholar
16. Davis, J, Babb, JR, Ayliffe, GAJ, et al: The effect on the skin flora of bathing with antiseptic solutions. J Antimicrob Chemother 1977; 3:473–481.Google Scholar
17. Seeberg, S, Limberg, A, Bergman, B: Preoperative shower bath with 4% chlorhexidine detergent solution: Reduction of Staphylococcus aureus in skin carriers and practical application, in Maibach, H, Aly, R (eds): Skin Microbiology: Relevance to Clinical Infection. New York. Springer Verlag, 1981, pp 86–91.Google Scholar
18. Jepsen, OB: Contamination of the wound during operation and postoperative wound infection. Ann Sing 1972; 177:178–180.Google Scholar
19. Davidson, AIG, Clark, C, Smith, G: Postoperative wound infection: A computer analysis. Br J Surg 1971; 58:333–337.Google Scholar
20. Kelly, MJ, Warren, RE: The value of an operative wound swab sent in transport medium in the prediction of later clinical wound infection: A controlled clinical and bacteriological evaluation. Br J Surg 1978; 65:81–88.Google Scholar
21. Cruse, PJE, Foord, R: A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg 1973; 107:206–209.Google Scholar
22. Brandberg, A. Holm, J, Hammarsten, J. et al: Postoperative wound infections in vascular surgery: Effect of preoperative whole body disinfection by shower bath with chlorhexidine soap. in Maibach, H, Aly, R (eds): Skin Microbiology: Relevance to Clinical Infection. New York, Springer Verlag, 1981, pp 98–102.Google Scholar
23. Aylifte, GAJ, Nov, MF, Babb, JR. et al: A comparison of preoperative bathing with chlorhexidine-detergent and non-medicated soap in the prevention of wound infection. J Hosp Infect 1983; 4:237–244.Google Scholar
24. Leigh, DA, Stonge, JL, Marriner, J, et al: Total body bathing with ‘Hibiscrub’ (chlorhexidine) in surgical patients: A controlled trial J Hosp Infect 1983; 4:229–235.Google Scholar
25. Rotter, ML and the European Working Party on Control of Hospital Infections: Pre-operative whole-body washing with chlorhexidine detergent: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of wound infection in elective clean surgery. Presented at the First International Conference of the Hospital Infection Society. London, England, 09 1987.Google Scholar
26. Hayek, LJ, Emerson, JM, Gardner, AMN: A placebo-controlled trial of the ef fect of two preoperative baths or showers with chlorhexidine detergent on postoperative wound infection rates. J Hosp Infect 1987; 10:165–172.Google Scholar